economies; and 4) research on global climate governance and carbon markets.Research in each of these four areas will enhance sociology’s contribution to climate change
scholarship. However, there is also an opportunity for cross-fertilization. Better understanding the causes and
consequences of climate change will contribute to the discipline of sociology. First, it offers new opportunities
to expand interest in and engagement with environmental concerns beyond the bounds of the subfield of
environmental sociology. Second, much of sociology’s theoretical tradition was developed within a nation-
state framework. Global issues, like climate change, provide opportunities to take social theory to the global
level.ReferencesAustin, Duncan, and Amanda Sauer. 2002. Changing Oil: Emerging environmental risks and shareholder value in
the oil and gas industry. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Bansal, Pratima, and Kendall Roth. 2000. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.
Academy of Management Journal 43 (4):717-736.
Baylis, Robert, Lianne Connell, and Andrew Flynn. 1998. Company size, environmental regulation and ecological
modernization: Further analysis at the level of the firm. Business Strategy and the Environment 7 (5):285-
296.
Biggart, Nicole, and Loren Lutzenhiser. 2007. Economic Sociology and the Social Problem of Energy Efficiency.
American Behavioral Scientist 50 (8):1070-1087.
Chorev, Nitsan. 2005. The Institutional Project of Neo-Liberal Globalism: The case of the WTO. Theory and
Society 34 (3):317-355.
Engels, Anita. 2006. Market Creation and Transnational Rule Making: The Case of CO 2 Emissions Trading. In
Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, edited by M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-
Andersson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
———. 2005. Counter-Hegemonic Globalizations: Transnational Social Movements in the Contemporary
Global Political Economy. In Handbook of Political Sociology, edited by T. Janoski, A. M. Hicks and M.
Schwartz. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, culture and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism.
International Organization 50 (2, Spring):325-347.
Fligstein, Neil. 1996. Markets as politics. American Sociological Review 61 (August):656-673.
———. 2002. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gladwin, Thomas N. 1993. The Meaning of Greening: A Plea for Organizational Theory. In Environmental
Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications, edited by
K. Fisher and J. Schot. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Haggard, Stephen. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in Newly Industrializing
Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hoffman, Andrew J. 2001. Linking Organizational and Field-Level Analyses: The Diffusion of Corporate
Environmental Practice. Organization & Environment 14 (2):133-156.
Hoffman, Andrew J., and Mark Ventresca, eds. 2002. Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment:
Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kay, Tamara. 2005. Labor Transnationalism and Global Governance: The Impact of NAFTA on Transnational