17
tificcuriosityontheother,leadustoprobebeneaththesurfaceinan
efforttofindouthowthingsareputtogether,howtheyarticulate.Tothe
nineteenth-centuryimpressionist,realismresidedinthesurfaceofthings,
whiletomanyartiststodaythesurfaceisonlyone ofmanylayersof
meaning.
Secondly,motionhasmoremeaningforustodaythaniteverdidinthe
past,andnothinghasmoreprofoundlyinfluencedthevisionofthemid-
twentiethcenturythanourawarenessofit.Theartistinstinctivelyrealizes
thatformsinmotionarenotidenticalwiththosesameformsinrepose,that
theeffectofmotionuponmatterisapowerfulbusiness,creatingtensions
andchangesateveryturn.Oursenseofaworldinmotionleadsustosee
manyimagesatonce,andwenolongerisolateourvisualconceptsaswas
thecasein,forinstance,theRenaissance.Mostofthevisualizationofthe
pastwasbasedontheassumptionthattheartisthimselfwasastaticfactor,
infrontofwhichthephysicaluniversedisplayeditself,anever-alluringsourceofcompellingthemes.Today,theartist'seye,liketheworldaround
him,isitselfinmotion,andbecomesapartofthetotalstream.Often,itis
notprimarilythethemeforitsownsakewithwhichtheartistisdealing,butitsmovementandthemovingqualityoftheartist'svision.
Finally(andcloselyrelatedtothepreviousidea),thecontemporary
artistisdeeplyinfluencedbywhatmaybecalledtheaerialpointofview.
Itisquiteremarkablethenumberofpaintingsinthisexhibition,andin
otherslikeit,whichmakeusfeelthatthedirectingartisticintelligencehaslookeddownattheworldofnaturefromagreatheight.Attimesthereis
something topographical,map-like,in muchrecent painting. But even
whenthisisnotspecificallythecase,thebroadexpanse,theendlesshorizon,
theextensionoftheartisticconceptbeyondtheconfinesoftheactual
physicalboundaryoftheworkofart,makeusrealizetheoverwhelming
effectwhichthespaciousworld-viewofourperiodhas haduponcon-temporaryartisticthinking.
IamofcoursenotsuggestingthattheparticularelementswhichIhavementionedwillexplainallofthequalitiestobeobservedinthepaintings
inthepresentexhibitionwhichdonotcontinuewell-establishedtraditions.