FINAL WARNING: Introduction
FINAL WARNING: A HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
INTRODUCTION
Since the Persian Gulf War, the term ‘New World Order’ has become
well known. However, there has never really been an explanation as to
what the term actually meant, only that it represented a new spirit of
cooperation among the nations of the world, in order to further the
cause of peace. And peace is good, so therefore the New World Order
is good and should be accepted. Not so fast. Like the old saying, you
can’t tell a book by its cover, there is more here than meets the eye.In regard to the term, William Safire wrote in the New York Times in
February, 1991: “...it’s Bush’s baby, even if he shares its
popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler ‘new order’ root; F.D.
R. used the phrase earlier.”The term ‘New World Order’ was actually first used many years ago.In an address delivered to the Union League of Philadelphia on
November 27, 1915, Nicholas Murray Butler said: “The old world order
changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order
passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it
had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a
volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that
day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth
pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come
out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.”In a 1919 subscription letter for the magazine International
Conciliation, M. C. Alexander, the Executive Secretary of the American
Association for International Conciliation wrote: “The peace
conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous
decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of
the new world order and the future peace of the world.”In August, 1927, Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, President of the Worldhttp://user.pa.net/~drivera/fwintro.htm (1 of 17)31-10-2004 06:25: