214 RATEOF RETURN ANALYSIS
From the plot of these data in Figure 7-5, we see that NPW=0 ati=8%.
217
'€
~
i:$G)
'"
Q..,~
...G)
Z
-1783
FIGURE 7-5 NPW plot for Example 7-5.
Thus, the incremental rate of return-b.IRR--of selecting Saleco rather than Leaseco is 8%. This
is less than the 10% MARR. Select Leaseco.
You must select one of two mutually exclusive alternatives.(Note:Engineering economists often
use the term "mutually exclusivealternatives" to emphasize that selecting one precludes selecting
any other alternative.) The alternatives are as follows:
Year
o
1
Alt. 1
-$10
+15
Alt. 2
-$20
+28
Any money not invested here may be invested elsewhere at the MARR of 6%. If you can choose
only one alternative one time, which one would you select using the internal rate of return (lRR)
analysis method?
:.~9!-qTION
Using the IRR analysis method, we will select the lesser-cost alternative (Alt. 1), unless we find
that the additional cost of Alt. 2 produces enough additionalbenefitsto make it preferable instead.
If we consider Alt. 2 in relation to Alt. 1, then
[
Higher-cost
]
=
[
LOWer-cost
]
+
[
Differences between
Alt. 2 Alt. 1 Alt. 1 and Alt. 2 ]
or
Differe~ces betwe;n ~t. 1 and Alt. 2=
[
Higher-cost
]
_
[
LOWer-cost
Alt. 2 Alt. 1 ]