Engineering Economic Analysis

(Chris Devlin) #1
GraphicalSolutions 249

Initial cost
Uniform annual benefit
End-of-useful-life-salvage value
Usefullife, in years

MachineX
$200
95
50
6

MachineY
$700
120
150
12

,- .-. .'.
.SOLUTION

Noting that for both Machine X and MachineY,the PW of cost reflectsthe conventionof treating
salvage value as a reduction in cost rather than a benefit, and using a 12-yearanalysis period, we
have

MachineX


PW of cost:;::: 200 + (200 --50)(PI F,10%,6) - 50(P/F,10%,12)


= 200 + 150(0.5645)-50(0.3186) = 269

PW of benefit:;:::95(PIA,1O%,12) = 95(6.814):;::: 647


Machine Y


fW of cost:;::: 700- 150(P IF,10%,12)=700 - 150(0.3186)== 652


PW of benefit = 120(PIA,10%,12)-120(6.814) :;:::818

Wben the two alternativesplotted (Figure 8-4), we see that the incrementY-X has a slope much
less than the 10% rate of return line. The rate of return on the increment of investmentis less than
10%; hence, the increment is undesirable. This means that Machine X should be selected rather
than MachineY.


EIGURE8-4 Benefit'-{;ost graph. $900

$800

'"$700
q::
g0) $600
J:Q
'S" $500


~$400
i:
~ $300
J:
$2QO

"' ,,$Joo

y

:=

=

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800
" Present Worth o£?€ost==f==- 'III~ "" -

I
I
I.

.t

'I
Ii
II
,\
'I
I]Ii'
I




Free download pdf