---~--Rationing Capital by Present Worth MethodsI.\}I
III529Solve Example 17-4 by the rate of return method. For project proposals with two or more
alternatives, incremental rate of return analysis is required. The data from Example 17-4 and
the computed rate of return for each alternative and each increment of investment are as
follows:The various separableincrements of investmentmay be ranked by rate of return. They are plotted
in a graph of cumulative cost versus rate of return in Figure 17-4. The ranking of projects by rate
of return gives the following:Project
lA
2A
3A :;;
IB inplace oflA
lC in place ofIB
---------- 3B."" ~-~in place of~ ~~::::iii:iii3A ::. -
Incremental AnalysisUniform Uniform
Annual Salvage Computed Annual Salvage Computed
,mbination Cost Benefit Value Rate of Cost Benefit Value Rate of
Alternatives (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Return (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) Return
)POScu1
A $100 $23.85 $^0 20.0%
B-A $ 50 $ 8.35 $ 0 10.6%
B 150 32.20 0 17.0
C-B 50 7.65 0 8.6
C-A 100 16.00 0 9.6
C 200 39.85 0 .15.0
b 0 0 0 0
)posal 2
50 14.92^0 15.0
B 0 0 0 0
iposal 3
4- 100 18.69 25 15.0
9-A 50 0.73 100 8.3
r1 150 19.42^125 12.0
0 0 0 0