received the traditional dynamite charge. More research
is needed to understand the full effects and parameters
of the dynamite charge as well as to explore alterna-
tives in the event that the dynamite charge is found to
unfairly pressure minority jurors.
Melissa B. Russano
See alsoJuries and Judges’ Instructions; Jury Deliberation;
Jury Size and Decision Rule
Further Readings
Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896).
Kassin, S. M., Smith, V. L., & Tulloch, W. F. (1990). The
dynamite charge: Effects on perceptions and deliberation
behavior of mock jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 14,
537–550.
Smith, V. L., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Effects of the dynamite
charge on the deliberations of deadlocked mock juries.
Law and Human Behavior, 17,625–643.
“Dynamite Charge”——— 247
D-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:42 PM Page 247