Another class of external correlates of psychopathy
comprises psychophysiological and behavioral vari-
ables that exhibit reliable patterns in North American
samples. The few cross-cultural studies investigating
such variables offer inconsistent findings. Additionally,
studies of performance on laboratory tasks that assess
cognitive and emotional processing in North America
suggest that Whites and Blacks high on psychopathic
traits may process information differently.
Studies conducted in North America and abroad on
the association between psychopathy and major men-
tal illness and personality disorders indicate similar
patterns for comorbid psychiatric diagnoses and self-
report personality traits. However, research investigat-
ing White and Black U.S. offenders suggests that
members of these groups do not manifest the same
patterns of correlations between psychopathy and
self-report personality measures. Whereas the associ-
ation between psychopathy and self-reported negative
affect is similar for Blacks and Whites, associations
between impulsivity and psychoticism are less consis-
tent. The observed discrepancies suggest that mecha-
nisms underlying psychopathy may differ for Blacks
and Whites and may be influenced by genetic and
sociocultural factors that vary across ethnic groups.
Measurement Generalization
Across Ethnic Groups
In contemporary research, psychopathy most often is
operationalized vis-à-vis the PCL family of measures.
Traditional psychometric evaluations indicate adequate
reliability for the PCL–R among non-White adults as
well as for adolescents of various ethnicities assessed
with the youth version of the measure. To demonstrate
cross-cultural equivalence of the PCL–R, it is also nec-
essary to demonstrate that the factor structure of the
measure is the same across ethnic groups (i.e., that the
same items or symptoms cluster together). There is
clear evidence of a replicable factor structure(s) among
White and Black adult men in U.S. prisons; among
White, Black, and Latino boys in the United States; and
among European men (including men from Scotland
and several continental European countries).
Cross-cultural equivalence in the case of the
PCL–R also requires that the association between test
scores and the latent trait of psychopathy be invariant
across ethnic groups (metric invariance), which may
be examined using item response theory (IRT). IRT
confers several distinct advantages to investigations of
cross-cultural disparities: Representative samples are
not required, more detailed analysis of individual rat-
ings can be provided, and a determination can be made
regarding whether scores are measured on the same
scale with different ethnic groups. An often-cited anal-
ogy that involves the measurement of temperature
using Fahrenheit and Celsius degrees may help clarify
the last point: Although both scales measure the same
construct, comparisons are meaningless because they
differ in zero points and scale increments. In the case
of the PCL–R, metric variance across groups is prob-
lematic because different scores could express the
same level of the latent trait of psychopathy (or, con-
versely, the same PCL–R score obtained by two groups
would not represent the same underlying level of the
disorder). In general, research using IRT methods indi-
cates that the PCL–R may be used in an unbiased way
with Blacks. However, there does appear to be evi-
dence of metric invariance between North America
and Europe (both in the United Kingdom and conti-
nental countries). Compared with North Americans,
Europeans tend to obtain lower PCL–R total, factor,
and item scores for the same level of the underlying
trait of the disorder, thereby prompting some experts to
recommend adjusting the diagnostic threshold of a
total PCL–R score of 30 used in North America to 28
when used in Europe. The symptoms tapping the defi-
cient affective experience seem to be the most diag-
nostic of psychopathy and are thought to be more
stable across cultures compared with the interpersonal
and behavioral features of the disorder. However, at
extreme levels of psychopathy, the interpersonal symp-
toms may provide more diagnostic information (espe-
cially in the United Kingdom). Research indicates that
these cross-national differences in psychopathy reflect
genuine differences in the expression of the disorder,
rather than raters’ perceptions of the psychopathic
symptoms.
Differences in Levels of
Psychopathic Traits
Because the generalizability of the measurement of
PCL–R total scores across Blacks and Whites has
been demonstrated, it is appropriate to use this instru-
ment to investigate whether these groups differ in the
extent to which they display psychopathic characteris-
tics. Two large-scale meta-analyses have examined
this issue for adults and adolescents. When differ-
ences between PCL–R total scores of Black and
264 ———Ethnic Differences in Psychopathy
E-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:42 PM Page 264