services available for people in prisons with mental ill-
nesses and the disproportionate number of prisoners
who suffer from a mental illness, the reality is that
many people with mental illnesses do not receive the
treatment they require when they are in prison—regard-
less of whether they have been found GBMI or not.
Despite the criticisms of the GBMI verdict and the
general lack of support for it, the verdict has proven quite
popular with politicians. Since its inception 25 years ago,
at least 20 states have enacted GBMI provisions.
James R. P. Ogloff
See also Insanity Defense Reform Act (IDRA); M’Naghten
Standard
Further Readings
Blunt, L. W., & Stock, H. V. (1985). Guilty but mentally ill:
An alternative verdict. Behavioral Sciences and the Law,
8,49–67.
Melville, J. D., & Naimark, D. (2002). Punishing the insane:
The verdict of guilty but mentally ill. Journal of the
American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 30,553–555.
People v. McQuillan, 392 Mich. 511, 221 N.W.2d 569 (1974).
Guilty but Mentally Ill Verdict——— 343
G-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:43 PM Page 343