Press, 1998), pp. 95–98. Kurki,Causation in International Relations, pp. 193 n6, 248,
attributed ‘as if’ thinking to Waltz, although the cited pages in TIPdo not actually use
this formula.
74 Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, p. 347.
75 Halliday and Rosenberg, ‘Interview with Ken Waltz’, p. 379. In this context, I cannot
say what Waltz may have had in mind in using the term positivist.
76 Rom Harré, Varieties of Realism: A Rationale for the Natural Sciences(Oxford: Basil
Blackwell, 1986), p. 38. On the ‘common-sense’ of realism, see Devitt, Realism and Truth,
ch. 5.
106 Structure? What structure?