Cities of God: The Religion of the Italian Communes 1125-1325

(Darren Dugan) #1

TheCityWorships 237 


All churches, except perhaps private chapels, had some sort of barrier or


physical demarcation separating the choir of the clergy from the nave of


the laity. This division reflected the clergy and people’s condominium of


ownership. The people stood or knelt to pray outside in the nave, which was


free of the modern clutter of pews. Medieval screens provided more than


visual access to the choir; the central door allowed processions to leave and


enter (fig. 30 ). The clergy came to the people’s side for rites like the blessing


of candles on Candlemas, and the people entered the choir for the marriage


blessing.^10 In the nave, the parishioners had great freedom of movement and


expression, in part because they literally owned it. Much to the irritation of


clerics, people wandered onto the clergy’s side of the screen to venerate altars


and relics or simply to gawk.^11 The screen was not an impassible barrier; its


door did not have a lock. Benvenuta Bojani once received Communion at a


Dominican church on the feast of the order’s founder. As she made her


thanksgiving, Saint Dominic himself appeared and healed her of a disability


in her legs. He then led her and two other pious women through the door


of the screen into the choir, much to the displeasure of the sacristan (who


could not see the saint). Benvenuta went directly to the high altar, where she


professed a vow of chastity to God. Other women in the church, inspired by


her example, crowded into the choir after her. After giving thanks there at


the side altars of the Blessed Virgin and Saint Dominic, Benvenuta cast away


her staff and walked home. Her hagiographer complained that her presence


in the choir was ‘‘contrary to custom,’’ but it was hardly unusual.^12


Nearly every church of the communal period was built with its apse


toward the east. When a bishop blessed a church, he pronounced the conse-


cratory prayers toward the east and the rising sun, positioning himself along


the west-east axis of the building.^13 When they assembled, the people and


clergy faced toward the east, toward the high altar. When Christians turned


to the east in western Europe, they also turned toward the Holy Land and


the city of Jerusalem, the place where the Savior died, rose, and would re-


turn.^14 Their posture showed that they expected the completion of salvation


history and the end of time. The assembly was a people on the march in


time and space; they did not pray turned in on themselves. So universal and


normative was this positioning in cosmic space and sacred time, even during


private prayer, that during the inquisition investigation of the popularly can-


onized Saint Armanno Pungilupo, the witness Bonfandino wondered



  1. See Verona, Biblioteca Capitolare,ms lxxxiv(xiicent.), fols. 73 v– 74 v.

  2. Cremona Cath. Stat. ( 1247 ), 40 ,p. 458.

  3. Corrado of Cividale,Vita Devotissimae Benevenutae, 3. 29 ,p. 157.

  4. Sicardo,Mitrale, 1. 2 , col. 17. On Sicardo’s views on the Mass, see Mary M. Schaefer, ‘‘Twelfth-
    Century Latin Commentaries on the Mass: Christological and Ecclesiological Dimensions’’ (Ph.D. diss.,
    University of Notre Dame, 1983 ).

  5. Richard C. Trexler,The Christian at Prayer: An Illustrated Prayer Manual Attributed to Peter the Chanter
    (d. 1197 )(Binghamton, N.Y.: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1987 ), 38.

Free download pdf