Cities of God: The Religion of the Italian Communes 1125-1325

(Darren Dugan) #1

 34 LaCitadeSancta


contado. Before the concentration of ritual activity at the Mother Church in


the 1100 s, there had already grown up, in city and countryside, a network of


baptismal churches, or pievi.^102 Such pievi dot the Italian countryside, but in


only one that I know of, San Giorgio in Brancoli, outside of Lucca, can one


see an intact communal-period baptismal font (fig. 28 ). Around Ferrara, for


example, some thirty-seven pievi existed before 1100.^103 The number of bap-


tismal churches in the valley of the Po increased rapidly after 1100 , and


scholars have identified some four hundred.^104 The pievi of Italy north of


Umbria had a nearly identical form and followed similar development.^105 In


the tithe lists for Liguria, for example, the typical rural baptismal church was


located in a population center. It was a collegiate church, that is, one staffed


by an archpriest and several deacons. There might also have been one or


more assistant priests.^106 Administratively, the archpriest had control over


priests and clerics staffing the network of chapels (cappelle) surrounding the


population center.^107 Baptisms and major feasts were conducted at the bap-


tismal church, and the clergy and people of the chapels attended them.^108


Chaplains of the subordinate chapels were appointed from there, with the


archpriest, orpievano,functioning something like the rural deans of contem-


porary England. Unlike the appointed subordinate chaplains, the pievano


was elected by the people of the baptismal church, although the bishop did


the ordination and actual appointment.^109 At Busto Arsizio in the diocese of


Novara, which appears earlier merely as a ‘‘locus,’’ a chapel was already in


place in the 1100 s. By 1212 , the chapel was a pieve, with baptismal font and


the right to elect the pievano. In 1343 , the parish was divided and a second


church built.^110 Pievi also served as secular administrative districts.^111 This


administrative identification mirrored the popular view, according to which



  1. On the pieve, see P. Zerbi, ‘‘Conclusione,’’Pievi e parrocchie,ed. Erba et al., 2 : 1200 – 202 ; for
    bibliography to 1988 , see L. Mascanzoni, ‘‘Saggio di bibliografia storica,’’Pievi e parrocchie in Italiai: Italia
    settentrionale,ed. A. Vasina (Bologna: n.p., 1988 ), esp. 285 – 97. On pievi in the Veronese contado, see
    Giuseppe Forchielli,La pieve rurale: Ricerche sulla storia della costituzione della Chiesa in Italia e particolarmente nel
    Veronese(Bologna: Zanichelli, 1938 ), 185 – 203.

  2. Samaritani, ‘‘Circoscrizioni,’’ 69 – 176 , esp. 69 – 138.

  3. Giancarlo Andenna, ‘‘Alcune osservazioni sulla pieve lombarda traxiiiexvsecolo,’’Pievi e
    parrocchie,ed. Erba et al., 2 : 682 ; Augusto Vasina, ‘‘Pievi e parrocchie in Emilia-Romagna dalxiiialxv
    secolo,’’ ibid., 728.

  4. Cinzio Violante, ‘‘Presentazione delle relazioni regionali dell’Italia centrale,’’Pievi e parrocchie,
    ed. Erba et al., 2 : 753.

  5. Sabatino Ferrali, ‘‘Pievi e clero plebano in diocesi di Pistoia,’’Bullettino storico pistoiese, 3 d ser., 8
    ( 1973 ): 40 , for Pistoia.

  6. Geo Pistarino, ‘‘Diocesi, pievi, e parrocchie nella Liguria medievale (secolixii–xv),’’Pievi e
    parrocchie,ed. Erba et al., 2 : 637.

  7. See Andenna, ‘‘Alcune osservazioni,’’ 684 , on Lombardy.

  8. Brentano,Two Churches, 68 – 70 , examines pievi in the Lucchese contado. Documents on rural
    pievi are edited inLa parrocchia studiata nei documenti lucchesi dei secoliviii–xiii,Analecta Gregoriana 47
    (Rome: Gregoriana, 1948 ).

  9. Andenna, ‘‘Alcune osservazioni,’’ 690.

  10. Pistarino, ‘‘Diocesi,’’ 653 , on Liguria; for another example, see Parma Stat.ii( 1266 ), 181 , where
    thelociof the contado are also called interchangeably ‘‘plebatus’’ or ‘‘ecclesiae baptismales.’’

Free download pdf