remembering, from the viewpoint of experiential intensity rather than
that of the object.
Now we see, through the reading of Proust, that the dimension in
which experience occurs is the experience of time, and that knowledge
is inseparable from it.
On the other hand, the position in which the subject of experience
posits itself is that of interpretation: the signs come to be interpreted
through the singularity of recollection, through the singular unfolding
of intensity:
One must be endowed for the signs, ready to encounter them, one
must open oneself to their violence. The intelligence always comes
after; it is good when it comes after; it is good only when it comes
after ... There is no Logos; there are only hieroglyphs... The essences are
at once the thing to be translated and the translation itself, the sign
and the meaning. They are involved in the sign in order to force us
to think; they develop the meaning in order to be necessarily con-
ceived. The hieroglyph is everywhere; its double symbol is the acci-
dent of the encounter and the necessity of thought: ‘fortuitous and
inevitable.’ (Proust and Signs, 101–2, emphasis in the original)^3
Duration, memory, vital impetus (élan vital) are central concepts of
Henri Bergson’s thought in the Deleuzian perspective. Bergson did not
limit himself to delineating a psychology, but established the bases for
a ‘complex ontology’, an ontology able to encompass multiplicity and
becoming:
Duration seemed to [Bergson] to be less and less reducible to a psy-
chological experience and became instead the variable essence of
things, providing the theme of a complex ontology. (Deleuze,
Bergsonism, 34)
How does one manage to understand reality? Proust said: by deci-
phering signs through the internal instruments of intuition and emo-
tional interpretation, following the interpretative line of memory in
time. Not with an investigation of the object, but an investigation of
the way in which we experience it. This is how reality is understood.
When we are sitting on the bank of a river, the flowing of the water,
the gliding of a boat or the flight of a bird, the uninterrupted
murmur of our deep life, are for us three different things or a single
Deleuze and the Rhizomatic Machine 61
9780230_221192_08_cha07.pdf 10/3/08 11:35 AM Page 61