The Economist (2022-01-08)

(EriveltonMoraes) #1

40 Middle East & Africa The Economist January 8th 2022


ics  and  Anthony  Venables  of  Oxford  Uni­
versity. So tight is this straitjacket that Mi­
chael  Ross  of  the  University  of  California
found that among 38 big oil exporters, nei­
ther good government nor democracy has
any solid relation with diversification. The
only thing that correlates is having less oil.
Yet  it  is  too  easy  to  blame  economics
alone. “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our
stars  but  in  ourselves,”  quips  Herbert
M’cleod,  who  is  based  in  Sierra  Leone  for
the  International  Growth  Centre,  a  re­
search  outfit.  Governments  often  spend
windfalls  from  commodities  on  fat  sala­
ries  rather  than  investing  them  in  infra­
structure  or  education.  They  are  “eating
the future”, laments Paul Collier of Oxford
University. All too often when cash is tight,
politicians try to renegotiate existing deals
to  get  more  tax,  or  simply  grab  mining  or
oil  companies.  “Let’s  own  the  minerals
ourselves,”  muses  Jacob Jusu Saffa, the
chief minister (ie, primeminister)ofSierra
Leone, in frustration atthelackofrevenue.
“Let’s own the companies.”Yettheresultof
state ownership is usuallyidleorunprofit­
able  mines  and  angryinvestorswhotake
their money and skills elsewhere.
Often  overlooked is the reality that
some politicians simplydonotwanttodi­
versify. Money from oiltendstogothrough
state coffers, where greedyhandscanskim
it  off.  Politically  connectedbigwigsoften
benefit in other ways too,saysRabahArez­
ki, a former chief economistattheAfrican
Development  Bank.  In many cases im­
ports,  which  tend  tojump duringcom­
modity booms, are controlledbya fewbig
players. If there is littlecompetitionfrom
domestic  producers,  theycan bumpup
prices and gouge ordinaryfolk.Aslongas
they  share  some  of  thiswealthwiththeir
friends in politics, thegovernmentwilldo
little to encourage localproduction.Inany
case,  creating,  say,  a clothing industry
from  scratch  is  slow,  sothereislittlerea­
son for politicians to putintheeffortif the
credit will be claimed bytheirsuccessors.
Even so, it is possibleforgovernments
to  manage  their  commoditiesbetter.One
basic  principle,  especiallyforthingslike
oil and minerals that willrunout,istoturn
riches in the ground intoothersourcesof
wealth, such as roads oraneducatedpopu­
lation.  The  World  Banknowarguesthat,
even if countries cannotdiversifytheirex­
ports, they will still bemakingprogressif
they diversify their sourcesofwealth.
Sierra  Leone’s  government is taking
note. It now spends about21%ofitsbudget
on education, up from13%in2017.Asa re­
sult, more youngsters arepassingtheirfi­
nal exams than ever before.Miningbegan
in Sierra Leone about acenturyago.“Ifwe
had  invested  in  humans for ahundred
years,”  sighs  David  MoininaSengeh,the
education  minister,  “we wouldbe in a
much better place today.”n

Uganda

The birds and the


“be quiet”


I

n 2016 ugandanofficialsburstinto  the
halls of Green Hill Academy, a highly re­
garded  primary  school  in  Kampala,  Ugan­
da’s  capital.  They  were  on  a  curious  mis­
sion. The minister for ethics and integrity
had ordered them to seize copies of Jacque­
line Wilson’s “Love Lessons”, a book about
how a 14­year­old girl called Prudence falls
in  love  with  her  art  teacher.  Conservative
Ugandans threw a fit, fretting that “erotic”
and  “distorted”  books  were  brainwashing
their children. Within months all forms of
sex  education  were  banned.  Last  Novem­
ber  a  court  lifted  the  parliamentary  ban
and  gave  the  education  ministry  home­
work—to write a new policy on how it will
teach children about sex.
The court case was not without surpris­
es. Ismail Mulindwa, a senior official in the
ministry, argued that teaching young peo­
ple  about  sex  could  lead  them  to  mastur­
bate  or  become  homosexual.  (Presumably
he thought these were bad things.) Conser­
vative  views  on  sex  education  start  at  the
top.  President  Yoweri  Museveni  and  his
wife Janet, the minister of education, have
long promoted celibacy as the best way to
prevent  sexually  transmitted  diseases.
Both  are  against  condoms,  arguing  they
promote  promiscuity.  And  the  first  lady
seems to think that contraceptive pills not
only  fail  to  prevent  pregnancy  but  also
erode  morals,  turning  Ugandans  into  sex­
crazed  people  who  “have  sex,  take  pills,
conceive and abort”. 

Ignorance is risky. Though deaths from
aids,  a  disease  caused  by  the  hiv virus,
have  fallen  sharply,  partly  because  many
people with it are now getting treated, the
virus is still a big cause of death in Uganda.
Less  than  half  of  young  Ugandans  know
how  to  avoid  catching  hivwhile  having
sex. Few seem to know much about contra­
ception either. Around a quarter of teenage
girls  are  pregnant  or  already  have  a  child.
Some  15%  are  married  by  the  age  of  15;
around half have tied the knot by 18. 
These alarming figures have been exac­
erbated  by  the  government’s  blundering
response to covid­19. It shut schools at the
start of the pandemic almost two years ago
and is only reopening them this month. By
June  last  year  the  teenage­pregnancy  rate
had jumped by 17% from March 2020. 
Officials  drafting  the  new  policy  could
perhaps learn from past mistakes. An earli­
er framework in 2018 suggested lifting the
ban on sex education. However, it also sug­
gested teaching children that the best way
of  not  catching  hivis  not  to  have  sex.  It
barely mentioned contraception. All it said
about  masturbation  was  that  no  one
should  do  it.  Its  only  reference  to  gay  sex
was the name of the law banning it. 
The  framework  mentioned  God  62
times  and  made  “God­fearing”  its  main
guiding  principle.  Yet  some  pious  folk
were still not satisfied. Some Muslims felt
the  policy  was  too  Christian;  some  Chris­
tians  thought  it  was  not  conservative
enough. The Reverend Stanley Ntagali, the
archbishop  of  the  Anglican  Church  of
Uganda, denounced the framework as part
of the “un’s pro­promiscuity, pro­gay, pro­
abortion sexual agenda”. A coalition of reli­
gious leaders agreed on only one thing: to
reject the policy altogether. 
Officials  drafting  the  new  framework
might  consider  what  has  worked  else­
where.  unesco has  foundthat  teaching
young  people  about  condoms  is  far  more
effective  at  curbing  pregnancies,  hivand
other  sexually  transmitted  diseases  than
only  teaching  them  abstinence.  A  better
framework  should  also  try  to  help  young
people  avoid  exploitative  or  violent  rela­
tionships, says Rose Wakikona of the Cen­
tre for Health, Human Rights and Develop­
ment,  a  Ugandan  non­profit  organisation
that  brought  the  case  that  overturned  the
ban.  She  describes  a  separate  case  of  a
nine­year­old  rape  victim,  who  testified
that a man “slept on her” because she was
unable to describe the act. 
Education  is  a  start,  but  it  is  only  one
piece  of  the  puzzle.  Some  28%  of  married
Ugandan women who want to use contra­
ceptives  cannot  get  them,  making  Ugan­
da’s “unmet need” for contraception high­
er than the average for sub­Saharan Africa,
where  25%  still  donotget  it.  It  is  not  just
the  education  ministrythat  has  plenty  of
homework to finish.n

A court unbans sex education
Free download pdf