Getting a balance
A talks mainly about issues at the level of behavior and
capabilities. This person is more likely to be affected by the
behavior of other people, by situations, by the results he
achieves. A's style is likely to be reactive. B, on the other hand,
discusses herself in terms of her identity. This is a person who
knows what she wants and gets it, a happy person, someone
who is proud of herself. This understanding and clarity about
her identity will permeate everything she does and the way she
perceives her experience.
The writer of C, however, describes himself as a shy and
inward person who doesn't believe in what he does and who
wishes he could be different. Even though he is sure about his
identity, it generates behavior that he doesn't want and would
like to change. It is certain that no matter what others do to tell
him he is capable and he need not worry, his beliefs about his
identity will override this.
So the writers of B and C are independently proactive but in
quite different ways, whereas the writer of A, whose attention is
more at the lower levels, is likely to be significantly affected by
day-to-day changes in behavior and environment.
You may be happy as you are. If, however, you are like the
subject of C who wants to change, it is important to identify at
what level you can make this change. For him the overriding
comments were at the level of identity and belief: “I am quite
a shy and inward person,” “I never believe in what I do.” One
does not necessarily have to lead to the other. He could, for
example, remain shy and inward and yet believe in what he
does. For him to achieve the changes he wants, he will need to
bring about change at the level of identity or spirituality.
For the subject of A, however, it would depend on whether
he wanted to change. If he felt he was unduly affected by
behavior and environment and wanted to develop greater
independence, he could pay attention to levels of
capabilities, beliefs, and identity.
I don’t know anyone who has a coherent state of alignment at
all times. What matters more is that the incidence of this state
226 NLP AT WORK