Bibliography 341Sandel, M. (1982).Liberalism and the Limits of Justice(Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press).
—— (1996).Democracy’s Discontents: America in Search of Public Philosophy(Cambridge, MA:
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
Schapiro, Ian (2002). ‘Problem, Method, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong
with Political Science and What to do About it’,Political Theory, 30: 4.
Schmidt, James (ed.) (1996).What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth Century Answers and Twentieth
Century Questions(Berkeley and London: University of California Press).
—— (1999). ‘How Historical isBegriffsgeschichte?’, Symposium on Melvin Richter’sThe History
of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical IntroductioninHistory of European Ideas, 25: 1–2.
—— (2000). ‘What Enlightenment Project?’,Political Theory, 28: 6.
Schrag, Calvin O. (1997).The Self after Postmodernity(New Haven and London: Yale University
Press).
Scruton, Roger (1990). ‘In Defence of the Nation’, in R. Scruton (ed.),The Philosopher on Dover
Beach(London: Carcanet Press).
Self, Peter(1993).Government by the Market: The Politics of Public Choice(London: Macmillan).
—— (2000). Rolling Back the Market: Economic Dogma and Political Choice(London:
Macmillan).
Shachar, Ayelet (2000). ‘On Citizenship and Multicultural Vulnerability’,Political Theory, 28: 1.
—— (2002).Multicultural Jurisdictions(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sher, G. (1987).Desert(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Shils, Edward (1968). ‘The Concept and Function of Ideology’,International Encyclopaedia of
the Social Sciences, Vol. VII.
Shklar, Judith (1984).Ordinary Vices(Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press of the
Harvard University Press).
Sidgwick, Henry (1907).Methods of Ethics(London: Macmillan).
Silverman, Hugh, J. (ed.) (1991).Gadamer and Hermeneutics(London: Routledge).
Simhony, A. and Weinstein, D. (eds.) (2001).The New Liberalism(Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press).
Simon, H. (1952). ‘The Development of the theory of Democratic Administration: Replies and
Comments’,American Political Science Review, 46.
Simons, Jon(1995). ‘TheExileofPoliticalTheory: TheLastHomelandofLegitimation’,Political
Studies, XLIII.
Skinner, Q. (1965). ‘History and Ideology in the English Revolution’,Historical Journal, VIII.
—— (1966). ‘The Ideological Context of Hobbes’ Political Thought’,Historical Journal, IX.
—— (1969). ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’,History and Theory,8.
—— (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vols. 1 and 2 (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press).
—— (1991). ‘The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives’, in
Richard Rorty et al. (eds.),Philosophy in History(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
—— (1998).Liberty before Liberalism(Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press).
Skocpol, T. (1979).State and Revolutions(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Smith, Adam (1979).An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations(Oxford:
Clarendon Press).
Soffer, Reba (1994).Discipline and Power: The University and the Making of an English Elite
1870–1930(Stanford: Stanford University Press).