The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music

(Brent) #1

306     


music vs speech sounds and also the role of automatically activated sound representations
in musical expertise.


Acknowledgements


The author thanks the Academy of Finland, University of Helsinki, and the Marie Curie
Fellowship of the European Commission. Special thanks to Elvira Brattico, M.A., for her
comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.


References


1.Shiffrin, R. M.and W. Schneider(1977) Controlled and automatic human information process-
ing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.Psychol. Rev.84, 127–90.
2.Näätänen, R.(1992) Attention and Brain Function.Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.Näätänen, R.and I. Winkler(1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cogni-
tive neuroscience.Psychol. Bull.125, 826–59.
4.Tervaniemi, M.(1999) Pre-attentive processing of musical information in the human brain.J.
New Music Res.28, 237–45.
5.Tiitinen, H., P. May, K. Reinikainen,et al. (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is gov-
erned by pre-attentive sensory memory.Nature372, 90–2.
6.Kraus, N., T. McGee, T. D. Carrell,et al. (1996) Auditory neurophysiologic responses and dis-
crimination deficits in children with learning problems.Science273, 971–3.
7.Tremblay, K., N. Kraus,and T. McGee(1998) The time course of auditory perceptual learning:
neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training.Neuroreport9, 3557– 60
8.Amenedo, E.and C. Escera.(2000) The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human
brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception.Euro.J.Neurosci.12, 2570–4.
9.Toiviainen, P., M. Tervaniemi, J. Louhivuori,et al. (1998) Timbre similarity: convergence of neu-
ral, behavioral, and computational approaches.Music Percept.16, 223–41.
10.Novak, G. P., W. Ritter, H.G. Vaughan Jr,et al. (1990) Differentiation of negative event-related
potentials in an auditory discrimination task.Electroencephal. Clin. Neurophysiol.75, 255–75.
11.Kane, N. M., S. H. Curry, C.A Rowlands,et al. (1996) Event-related potentials—neurophysiological
tools for predicting emergence and early outcome from traumatic coma.Intensive Care Med.22,
39 – 46.
12.Fischer, C., D. Morlet, P. Bouchet,et al. (1999) Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked
potentials in comatose patients.Clin. Neurophysiol.110, 1601–10.
13.Gene-Cos, N., H. A. Ring, R. C. Pottinger,et al. (1999) Possible roles for mismatch negativity in
neuropsychiatry.Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol.12, 17–27.
14.Näätänen, R.and M. Hoke(eds) (2000) Special issue on mismatch negativity and its clinical
applications.Audiol. Neuro-Otol.5, 101–246.
15.Schulte-Korne, G., W. Deimel, J. Bartling,et al. (1998) Auditory processing and dyslexia: evi-
dence for a specific speech processing deficit.Neuroreport9, 337–40.
16.Schulte-Korne G., W. Deimel, J. Bartling,et al. (1999) Pre-attentive processing of auditory pat-
terns in dyslexic human subjects.Neurosci. Lett.276, 41–4.

Free download pdf