The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music

(Brent) #1

as a function of stimulus structure in real melodies. This may allow an objective quantifica-
tion of perceptual coherence of melodies in individuals who cannot easily give details of
their perception, such as young children and infants. Without question, future studies of
melody and the brain will benefit from the integration of existing approaches (e.g. neuro-
psychology, ERPs, fMRI, and dynamic aSSR), as well as the development of new
approaches. No matter what the approach, the goal is the same: to understand how the
mind converts ‘mere sequences of tones’into meaningful cognitive and aesthetic experiences,
which can reside in memory for a lifetime.


Acknowledgements


This work was supported by Neurosciences Research Foundation as part of its program on
music and the brain at The Neurosciences Institute, where A.D. Patel is the Esther J.
Burnham fellow. I thank Joseph Daniele and John Iversen for technical assistance with
figures and sound examples, and W. Jay Dowling, John Iversen, and Bruo Repp for comments
which improved the manuscript.


References


1.Hast, D. E.,J. R. Cowdery, and S. Scott(eds) (1999) Exploring the World of Music. Dubuque:
Kendall Hunt. (Quote from interview with Simon Shaheen in video program #6: Melody.)
2.Schaffrath, H.(1995) In D. Huron (ed.) The Essen Folksong Collection in the Humdrum Kern
Format. Menlo Park, CA: Center for Computer Assisted Research in the Humanities.
3.Selfridge-Feld, E.(1995) The Essen Musical Data Package. CCARH (Center for Computer
Assisted Research in the Humanities) Technical Report No. 1. Menlo Park, CA: CCARCH.
4.Meyer, L. B.(1973) Explaining Music: Essays and Explorations. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
5.Narmour, E.(1990) The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication-
realization Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.Narmour, E.(1992) The Analysis and Cognition of Melodic Complexity: The Implication-realization
Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.Hajda, J. M.,R. A. Kendall,E. C. Carterette, and M. L. Harshberger(1997) Methodological issues
in timbre research. In I. Deliège and J. Sloboda (eds) Perception and Cognition of Music.Hove,
UK: Psychology Press, pp. 253–306.
8.Lerdahl, F.and R. Jackendoff (1983) A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
9.Jusczyk, R.and C. Krumhansl(1993) Pitch and rhythmic patterns affecting infants’sensitivity to
musical phrase structure.J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.19(3), 627–40.
10.Large, E.(2000) On synchronizing movements to music.Hum. Movement Sci.19, 527–66.
11.Snyder, J.and C. L. Krumhansl(2001) Tapping to ragtime: cues to pulse finding.Music Percept.
18(4), 455–89.
12.Cooper, G. W.and L. B. Meyer(1960) The Rhythmic Structure of Music. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.


342     

Free download pdf