Italian Ceramics: Catalogue of the J. Paul Getty Museum Collection

(Nancy Kaufman) #1

17


Bust of Christ


Montelupo


ca. 1500


Tin-glazed earthenware


H: 60.3 cm (23^3 A in.)


W: 59.7 cm (23 Vi in.)


D: 26 cm (IO^1 /A in.)


87.SE.14 8


MARKS AND INSCRIPTIONS
None.


CONDITION
Minor cracks and glaze faults; proper right tip of
the beard is chipped; some original gilding has
worn off the neck of the tunic and the base; the
crown displays holes into which thorns, possibly
of wood or ivory, may have been inserted.^1 The
bust underwent thermoluminescence analysis in
1986 that indicated that the material is consistem
with the expected age of the object (i.e., that
the material was last fired between 370 and
570 years ago).

PROVENANCE
Private collection, Belgium (sold, Sotheby's, Lon­
don, April 7, 1987, lot 44, to R. Zietz); [Rainer

Zietz, Ltd., London, sold to the J. Paul Getty Mu­
seum, 1987].

EXHIBITIONS
None.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Burlington Magazine 129 (March 1987): i;
II giornale dell'arte, no. 45 (1987): 90, fig. 50;
GettyMusJ 16 (1988): 180, no. 77; Hess 1988A,
no. 16; Fusco 1997, 67; Summary Catalogue
2001, no. 356.

THIS SCULPTURE IS A BUST OF CHRIST CROWNED with


thorns. Like devotional images of the subject in other


media, the bust is half-length, terminating above the el­


bows and through the chest. As befits this image of


Christ before his accusers after being scourged, his face


is drawn and gaunt and his bearing is righteous. Presum­


ably the sculpture was intended for an intimate devo­


tional setting such as a private chapel.


Christ's long curling hair lies flat against his head,


closely following the shape of his head, neck, and shoul­


ders. He wears a tunic decorated with finely drawn geo­


metric patterns and a cloak over his left shoulder. His


eyebrows, eyes, and beard are painted with thin, blackish


blue lines; the crown of thorns is painted with a mixture


of the same dark cobalt pigment and emerald green. The


neck of the tunic and the low, plinthlike base have been


cold-gilded, and much of this gilding has worn away. The


back of this bust is finished in a simple, unsculptural


manner. Here, rather than naturalistically modeled, the


hair is hastily rendered with incised lines, and the crown


of thorns is linked at the back with a painted cobalt loop.


This remarkable work possesses a sculptural force


and sophistication almost never found in maiolica.


Although the artist is unknown, the incisive depiction


of a taut and sinewy face displaying a proud, almost


haughty demeanor can be most closely compared to the


work of late fifteenth-century Tuscan sculptors such as


Lorenzo Vecchietta (1412-80), Matteo Civitali (1436-


1501), Andrea Sansovino (ca. 1460-1529),^2 Andrea del


Verrocchio (i435?-i488), and the so-called Master of the
Marble Madonnas (fl. ca. 1470-1500). Like the Museum's
example in maiolica, busts of Christ by these artists are
vigorously modeled and depict Christ with curling hair,
parted beard, and a crown of thorns (sometimes pierced
with holes, perhaps to hold thorns made of another ma­
terial), and always with an air of authority.^3
Although many of the above-named sculptors pro­
duced busts in terra-cotta, sometimes polychromed,
only a Bust of Christ attributed to Sansovino in a private
Aretine collection is of glazed earthenware, or maiolica
(fig. 17E). This work displays a similar noble gaze, long
and curling hair, and plain white glaze ground, with only
a few details (eyes and eyebrows) picked out with thin
dark blue lines as in the Getty Museum's example, al­
though it has a gentler and less powerful aspect.^4
Maiolica busts of Christ probably influenced by
Verrocchio and produced in the Florentine della Robbia
workshop also exist, although they differ considerably in
sculptural style and decoration from the present work.^5
It does appear that the Getty bust resulted from the
collaboration of a sculptor and ceramist. From the un­
derside one learns that the basic form of the bust was
built using coils of clay of varying lengths that were at­
tached to one another and smoothed together on the ex­
terior surface (fig. 17c). This method is one of the most
basic and widespread of all pottery-building techniques,
and one must assume that a potter was responsible for
this phase of manufacture. However, the important job

96

Free download pdf