ones in essential cognitive functions. Even faith and belief seem to be
simple by-products of the way concepts and inferences are doing their
work for religion in much the same way as for other domains.
Instead of a religious mind, what we have found is a whole frustra-
tion of invisible hands. One of these guides human attention toward
some possible conceptual combinations; another enhances recall of
some of these; yet another process makes concepts of agents far easier
to acquire if they imply strategic agency, connections to morality, etc.
The invisible hand of multiple inferential systems in the mind pro-
duces all sorts of connections between these concepts and salient
[330] occurrences in people's lives. The invisible hand of cultural selection
makes it the case that the religious concepts people acquire and trans-
mit are in general the ones most likely to seem convincing to them,
given their circumstances.
I call this a frustration because religion is portrayed here as a mere
consequence or side effect of having the brains we have, which does
not strike one as particularly dramatic. But religion isdramatic, it is
central to many people's existence, it is involved in highly emotional
experience, it may lead people to murder or self-sacrifice. We would
like the explanation of dramatic things to be equally dramatic. For
similar reasons, people who are shocked or repulsed by religion would
like to find the singlesource of what is for them such egregious error,
the crossroads at which so many human minds take the wrong turn, as
it were. But the truth is that there is no such single point, because
many different cognitive processes conspire to make religious con-
cepts convincing.
I am of course slightly disingenuous in describing this as a frustra-
tion, when I think it is such a Good Thing. That we fail to identify
hidden hands and simple designs and instead discover a variety of
underlying processes that we know how to study sometimes happens in
scientific endeavors and is always for the better. The progress is not
just that we understand religion better because we have better knowl-
edge of cognitive processes. It is also, conversely, that we can highlight
and better understand many fascinating features of our mental archi-
tecture by studying the human propensity toward religious thoughts.
One does learn a lot about these complex biological machines by fig-
uring out how they manage to give airy nothing a local habitation and
a name.
RELIGION EXPLAINED