The Economist - USA (2022-01-15)

(Antfer) #1
The Economist January 15th 2022 SpecialreportBusinessandthestate 11

Corporatetaxes

To tax or not to tax


F


or worldpeace,theLeagueofNationswasanabjectfailure.
For companies, it has proved a great success.Inthe1920sit seta
basis for corporate taxation that has enduredeversince.Recognis­
ing  that  taxing  profits  in  different  placescan hurttrade and
growth, rights to tax were allocated first whereprofitsaregenerat­
ed and only second where a company sitesitsheadquarters.
This  principle  has  now  been  enshrinedinbilateraltaxtrea­
ties—with unintended consequences. Governmentshaverealised
they can lure investment with lower tax rates.Between 1985 and
2018 the average corporate­tax rate fell from49%to24%.Manytax
havens charge zero. The idea has grown thatcollectingtaxesfrom
rapidly growing, efficient firms is “whippingthefastox”.
Companies have also learned to pay lesstaxbyshiftingreport­
ed earnings, which is easier with the rise ofintangibleassetssuch
as brands. Although only 5% of American multinationals’foreign
staff  work  in  tax  havens,  they  book  nearlytwo­thirdsofforeign
profits there, twice as much as in 2000. In 2016around$1trnofglo­
bal profits were booked in “investment hubs”suchastheCayman
Islands, Ireland and Singapore, whose averageeffectivetaxrateon
profits is 5%. According to an oecdstudy in2015,thisrobbedpub­
lic  coffers  of  $100bn­240bn  a  year,  equivalentto4­10%ofglobal
corporate­tax revenues.
Some  action  to  improve  and  simplify  corporatetaxationwas
long overdue. But with business fast going fromsacredoxtowhip­
ping boy, governments have become less concernedwithcreating
a better system and more with just gettingfirmstopaymoretax.
Britain has decided to raise its corporate­taxratefrom19%to25%,
becoming only the second oecdcountry todososince 2000 (the
first, Chile, has reversed its decision). In AmericamoderateDemo­
crats  stopped  Joe  Biden  undoing  his  predecessor’staxreform,
which  cut  the  corporate­tax  rate  from  35%to21%.ButhisBuild
Back Better bill floated a tax on share buybacksandanexcisetaxof
95%  on  sales  of  drugs  for  which  drug  firmsrefusedtonegotiate
prices with the Medicare system.
The bill would also have raised the minimumratethatAmer­
ican multinationals pay on global profits from10.5%to15%.This
could have raised an extra $30bn a year. It
would  also  have  aligned  America  with  a
new tax pact negotiated through the oecd.
Fully 136 countries have signed up to a 15%
global  minimum  rate,  and  allocated  more
taxing rights from where companies book
profits to where they make sales. The oecd
hopes to get this deal into force in 2023. Mr
Furman,  the  former  economic  adviser  to
Barack Obama, calls it “a real sea change” in
how  companies  are  taxed.  Others  throw
around terms like “once in a century” and
“revolution”.
The  reallocation  of  taxing  rights  will
apply only to companies with global turn­
over  above  €20bn  ($24bn),  and  only  on
pre­tax profits exceeding 10% of revenues.
It  is  likely  to  raise  a  “modest  amount”,
thinks Michael Devereux of Oxford Univer­

sity’sSaidBusinessSchool.Someestimatesputitatatrifling
$5bn­12bnayear worldwide.Mr Devereuxreckonsthe global
minimummayraiseanextra4­5%ontopofwhatcompaniesal­
readypay,oraround$100bnannually.
Yetthisunderplaysthesignificanceoftheshift.Therealloca­
tionaffectssome 110 multinationalgroups saysDavidBradburyof
theoecd. MostareAmerican.Theyprobablyincludetheusual
suspectssuchasAppleandAmazon,whichhaveperfectedtheart
oftaxoptimisation.Thesefirmsfacea costlyandtediousunwind­
ingoftheirtaxarrangements—anda higheroverallbill.Asforthe
globalminimum,MrBradburyexpectscountriesandcompanies
toaltertheirbehaviour.Switzerland,whichsupportsthepact,is
murmuringaboutnewtaxincentivestoremainattractive.“Itwill
bemessy,”sumsupanexecutiveatoneAmericanmultinational.
Companiesmightoncehavekickedupa fussovertheoecd
deal.Theyhavethoughtbetterofit,givenintensifyinganti­busi­
nesssentiment.Somehaveevenpraisedtheharmonisationeffort.
Inprivate,though,executivesgrumblethattheoecdplanis“a
convenientvehicle”toraisetaxesathome.That,saysonetech
boss,iswhatMrBidenisdoing.NeilBradleyoftheusChamberof
Commercewarnsofmovingfroma racetothebottomto“araceto
thetop”.Iftaxauthoritiesbelievetheywillavoidleakage,hesays,
theymayconclude“Wecantaxasmuchaswewant.”MrDevereux
wouldnotbesurprisedif corporatetaxescreepup.
Theremaybemoreunintendedconsequences.Onemysteri­
ousfeatureofthe40­yearslideincorporate­taxrateshasbeenthat
companies’contributiontopubliccoffershasremainedflatin
richcountries,ataboutone­tenthofthetaxtake,or2­3%ofgdp.
Inpooreronesthefiguresareslightlyhigherbutequallysteady.
Analystsputthisdowntomorefirmspayingtax,corporateprofits
growingandwealthyindividualsusingcompaniestoreclassify
highlytaxedpersonalincomeaslower­taxedcorporateincome.
Thebaseofpayerslooksunlikelytodwindle.Onceknownto
taxmen,firmsrarelyextricatethemselvesfromtheirgrasp.How
thechangesaffectprofitsishardertojudge.Expertsdonotexpect
theoverhaultodampenpre­taxprofits,thoughthatcouldhappen
ifhigherratesdiscouragedinvestment.Somesignatoriestothe
dealmayretaintheiredgewithoffsettingsweetenerssuchaslow­
ertaxesonindividualsorproperty.
Therearealsounknownunknownswhichmaybecomeclearer
onlyoncefirmshaveadjusted.Twothingscanbepredicted.A bo­
nanzaawaitstaxlawyersandaccountants.Andthenewequilibri­
umwillbelessfavourabletocompanies.Onebossofa bigmulti­
nationalcompanysuggeststhatthetaxsystemistheultimatetest
ofwhatcountriescareabout.Theimplicationisthattheycareless
thanbeforeaboutkeepingbusinesshappy.n

After falling for decades, taxes on companiesarerisingagain

Inflection point

Source:OECD

*Includescentralandsub-centralrates †Proposedfor 2023 ‡Countrieswithinward investment
exceeding10%ofannualGDP §Profitscoulddouble-countintracompany dividends

50

40

30

20

10

0
2000 05 10 15 21

Statutorycorporate-taxrate*,%

UnitedStates

Britain

Ireland

Germany
France

OECDproposed
minimum


Employees

Tangibleassets

Totalrevenues

Profit§

Ta x

403020100

Share of multinational enterprises’
foreign activities by location, 201, %

High-income Investment hubs‡

Low-income countries Middle-income

0.16
0.07
0.06
0.14
0.1
Free download pdf