The Economist January 15th 2022 SpecialreportBusinessandthestate 11CorporatetaxesTo tax or not to tax
F
or worldpeace,theLeagueofNationswasanabjectfailure.
For companies, it has proved a great success.Inthe1920sit seta
basis for corporate taxation that has enduredeversince.Recognis
ing that taxing profits in different placescan hurttrade and
growth, rights to tax were allocated first whereprofitsaregenerat
ed and only second where a company sitesitsheadquarters.
This principle has now been enshrinedinbilateraltaxtrea
ties—with unintended consequences. Governmentshaverealised
they can lure investment with lower tax rates.Between 1985 and
2018 the average corporatetax rate fell from49%to24%.Manytax
havens charge zero. The idea has grown thatcollectingtaxesfrom
rapidly growing, efficient firms is “whippingthefastox”.
Companies have also learned to pay lesstaxbyshiftingreport
ed earnings, which is easier with the rise ofintangibleassetssuch
as brands. Although only 5% of American multinationals’foreign
staff work in tax havens, they book nearlytwothirdsofforeign
profits there, twice as much as in 2000. In 2016around$1trnofglo
bal profits were booked in “investment hubs”suchastheCayman
Islands, Ireland and Singapore, whose averageeffectivetaxrateon
profits is 5%. According to an oecdstudy in2015,thisrobbedpub
lic coffers of $100bn240bn a year, equivalentto410%ofglobal
corporatetax revenues.
Some action to improve and simplify corporatetaxationwas
long overdue. But with business fast going fromsacredoxtowhip
ping boy, governments have become less concernedwithcreating
a better system and more with just gettingfirmstopaymoretax.
Britain has decided to raise its corporatetaxratefrom19%to25%,
becoming only the second oecdcountry todososince 2000 (the
first, Chile, has reversed its decision). In AmericamoderateDemo
crats stopped Joe Biden undoing his predecessor’staxreform,
which cut the corporatetax rate from 35%to21%.ButhisBuild
Back Better bill floated a tax on share buybacksandanexcisetaxof
95% on sales of drugs for which drug firmsrefusedtonegotiate
prices with the Medicare system.
The bill would also have raised the minimumratethatAmer
ican multinationals pay on global profits from10.5%to15%.This
could have raised an extra $30bn a year. It
would also have aligned America with a
new tax pact negotiated through the oecd.
Fully 136 countries have signed up to a 15%
global minimum rate, and allocated more
taxing rights from where companies book
profits to where they make sales. The oecd
hopes to get this deal into force in 2023. Mr
Furman, the former economic adviser to
Barack Obama, calls it “a real sea change” in
how companies are taxed. Others throw
around terms like “once in a century” and
“revolution”.
The reallocation of taxing rights will
apply only to companies with global turn
over above €20bn ($24bn), and only on
pretax profits exceeding 10% of revenues.
It is likely to raise a “modest amount”,
thinks Michael Devereux of Oxford University’sSaidBusinessSchool.Someestimatesputitatatrifling
$5bn12bnayear worldwide.Mr Devereuxreckonsthe global
minimummayraiseanextra45%ontopofwhatcompaniesal
readypay,oraround$100bnannually.
Yetthisunderplaysthesignificanceoftheshift.Therealloca
tionaffectssome 110 multinationalgroups saysDavidBradburyof
theoecd. MostareAmerican.Theyprobablyincludetheusual
suspectssuchasAppleandAmazon,whichhaveperfectedtheart
oftaxoptimisation.Thesefirmsfacea costlyandtediousunwind
ingoftheirtaxarrangements—anda higheroverallbill.Asforthe
globalminimum,MrBradburyexpectscountriesandcompanies
toaltertheirbehaviour.Switzerland,whichsupportsthepact,is
murmuringaboutnewtaxincentivestoremainattractive.“Itwill
bemessy,”sumsupanexecutiveatoneAmericanmultinational.
Companiesmightoncehavekickedupa fussovertheoecd
deal.Theyhavethoughtbetterofit,givenintensifyingantibusi
nesssentiment.Somehaveevenpraisedtheharmonisationeffort.
Inprivate,though,executivesgrumblethattheoecdplanis“a
convenientvehicle”toraisetaxesathome.That,saysonetech
boss,iswhatMrBidenisdoing.NeilBradleyoftheusChamberof
Commercewarnsofmovingfroma racetothebottomto“araceto
thetop”.Iftaxauthoritiesbelievetheywillavoidleakage,hesays,
theymayconclude“Wecantaxasmuchaswewant.”MrDevereux
wouldnotbesurprisedif corporatetaxescreepup.
Theremaybemoreunintendedconsequences.Onemysteri
ousfeatureofthe40yearslideincorporatetaxrateshasbeenthat
companies’contributiontopubliccoffershasremainedflatin
richcountries,ataboutonetenthofthetaxtake,or23%ofgdp.
Inpooreronesthefiguresareslightlyhigherbutequallysteady.
Analystsputthisdowntomorefirmspayingtax,corporateprofits
growingandwealthyindividualsusingcompaniestoreclassify
highlytaxedpersonalincomeaslowertaxedcorporateincome.
Thebaseofpayerslooksunlikelytodwindle.Onceknownto
taxmen,firmsrarelyextricatethemselvesfromtheirgrasp.How
thechangesaffectprofitsishardertojudge.Expertsdonotexpect
theoverhaultodampenpretaxprofits,thoughthatcouldhappen
ifhigherratesdiscouragedinvestment.Somesignatoriestothe
dealmayretaintheiredgewithoffsettingsweetenerssuchaslow
ertaxesonindividualsorproperty.
Therearealsounknownunknownswhichmaybecomeclearer
onlyoncefirmshaveadjusted.Twothingscanbepredicted.A bo
nanzaawaitstaxlawyersandaccountants.Andthenewequilibri
umwillbelessfavourabletocompanies.Onebossofa bigmulti
nationalcompanysuggeststhatthetaxsystemistheultimatetest
ofwhatcountriescareabout.Theimplicationisthattheycareless
thanbeforeaboutkeepingbusinesshappy.nAfter falling for decades, taxes on companiesarerisingagainInflection pointSource:OECD*Includescentralandsub-centralrates †Proposedfor 2023 ‡Countrieswithinward investment
exceeding10%ofannualGDP §Profitscoulddouble-countintracompany dividends50403020100
2000 05 10 15 21Statutorycorporate-taxrate*,%UnitedStatesBritainIrelandGermany
FranceOECDproposed
minimum†EmployeesTangibleassetsTotalrevenuesProfit§Ta x403020100Share of multinational enterprises’
foreign activities by location, 201, %High-income Investment hubs‡Low-income countries Middle-income0.16
0.07
0.06
0.14
0.1