54 Business The Economist January 15th 2022
BusinessinGermanyWhat the
Mittelstand wants
T
hebossesofGermany’s3.6mmedium
sizedandsmallmanufacturingfirms
wouldhavelovedtoseelastyear’sgeneral
electionyielda probusinessgovernment
of the centreright Christian Democrats
andtheliberalFreeDemocrats(fdp). What
theMittelstandgotinsteadwasa pactbe
tweentheSocialDemocrats(spd), thefdp
andtheGreens.Thatisstilltooleftiefor
manytastes.Butitcouldhavebeenworse.
PlentyofchiefexecutivesfearedthatOlaf
Scholz,thenewspdchancellor,wouldrow
backhispreelection vownotto forma
businessbashingcoalitionthatwouldin
cludeDieLinke, a hardleftparty.
Adisasteravertedmaybeonereason
whytheMittelstandisnotdespondentat
thestartofthenewyear.Anotheristhatbig
chunksofthecoalitiontreaty,whichruns
thelengthofa slimnovel,“gointheright
direction”, says HansJürgen Völz, chief
economist of the bvmw, a Mittelstand
tradebody.Still,severalgripesremain.
One is taxation. During the election
campaignthespd, theGreensandDieLinke
mootedtheideaofreintroducinga wealth
taxandraisinginheritancetaxes.Sucha
movewouldhittheMittelstand’sfamily
firmshard.Itnowappearstobeofftheta
blethanks to oppositionfromthe fdp,
whoseboss,ChristianLindner,isthenew
financeminister.Butso,too,isthepros
pectofa corporatetaxcut,froma headline
rateof30%to25%,andtheabolitionofthe
personal“solidarity”tax(knownassoli),
theproceedsfromwhichflowtothefor
merlycommunisteast.
TheMittelstand’ssecondpeeveisred
tape.“BureaucracyiscostingGermanbusi
nessaround€50bn($57bn)a year,”saysMr
Völz.Overthelastdecadeparliamenthas
passedthreelegislativepackagesto ease
the bureaucratic burden on the Mittel
stand. But little real progress has been
made.AccordingtoNikolasStihl,headof
thesupervisoryboardofStihl,theworld’s
leadingmakerofchainsaws,excessivebu
reaucracyhelpsexplainwhyGermanyis 30
yearslatewithbiginfrastructureprojects
suchasthefeederroadforthe55kmrail
waytunnelthatisbeingdugbeneaththe
BrennerPasslinkingAustriaandItaly.“We
don’tknowanymorehowtoimplement
bigprojects,”sighsMrStihl.
Besidestheselongstandinggripesthe
Mittelstandhastwomorepressingones.
Asinmanycountries,Germanfirmsstrug
gletofindqualifiedworkers—oranyworkers. Bosses want Mr Scholz to push the eu
to extend the “blue card”, a work permit
that helps universityeducated migrants
take up job offers in the bloc, to bluecollar
workers. A separate Chancenkarte(oppor
tunitycard)promisedinthecoalitiontrea
tywouldenablemigrantstolookforwork
in Germany providedthey fulfilcriteria
suchasa workingknowledgeofGerman.
Themostburningproblemformanu
facturersisthesoaringcostofenergy.Ma
nyalsofretaboutGermany’sdependence
onRussiangas.“Evenworsethanthe70%
increaseofourcompany’senergycosts is
theworryaboutsecurityofsupply,”says
FerdinandMunk,ownerandbossofGünz
burger Steigtechnik, a makerofladders
andrescuekitinBavaria.Heworriesthat
“thegastapscouldbeturnedoffatany
time.”SofarMrScholzhasnotsignalled
howheplanstotackletheenergyproblem.
AtleasttheMittelstand’smoodisleav
enedbyburstingorderbooks.Asdemand
forgoodsballoonedinthepandemic,Ger
man firmsinthemanufacturing supply
chainhavethrived.“Wehavethehighest
numberofordersinournearly100year
history,”beamsAndreasMöller,a spokes
manforTrumpf,a makerofmachinetools
inthesouthGermancityofDitzingen. A
covidera gardening boom helped lift
Stihl’ssalesfrom€3.9bnin 2019 to€4.6bn
in2020—andthefirmispoisedtoreport
recordrevenuesin2021,too.
Morethanhalfofthefirmspolled by
thebvmwina recentsurveyreportedthat
they were in good or very good shape.
Nearly45%saidtheywouldhiremorestaff
thisyear.Over70%willmaintainorin
creaseinvestments.Ifshortagesofwork
ersorenergypreventthesepocketpower
housesfromfulfillingorders,MrScholz
maylosemuchoftheremaininggoodwill
thattheMittelstandstillharbours.nB ERLIN
Heartland manufacturers size up the
new governmentIf only it were so easy with red tapeTheoilindustryThe new
great game
C
alls forthe oil business to decarbo
nise are growing louder just about
everywhere, and not merely from govern
ments and environmentalists. Moody’s, a
rating agency, reckons that half of the
$1.8trn of global energy debt that it evalu
ates is held by asset managers and insurers
that face increasing pressure on environ
mental, social and governance (esg)
fronts, notably the climate. An annual sur
vey of 250 big institutional investors pub
lished on January 6th by the Boston Con
sulting Group (bcg) found that more than
four in five think it is important for compa
nies to establish targets for longterm
emissions reductions. Nearly as many
“feel increased pressure” to apply green fil
ters to their investments.
At the same time, the International En
ergy Agency, a global forecaster, expects
worldwide oil consumption to return to its
prepandemic level of 100m barrels a day
(b/d) in 2022. Even if it rose by no more
than 1% per year after that, the natural rate
of reservoir depletion means that 12m17m
b/d of new supply must be added in the
next five years to meet demand, reckons
Alastair Syme of Citigroup, a bank. Inves
tors recognise this. As economies re
opened last year after the worst ravages of
the pandemic and the oil price recovered—
this week it is flirting with a sevenyear
high of $85 a barrel—energy became the
best performing sector in the s&p500 in
dex of large American firms, ahead of tech
nology and finance. It left environmentally
friendly stock picks in the dust (see chart
on next page).
This tension was on display last month
at the World Petroleum Congress in Hous
ton, a triennial celebration of hydrocar
bons attended by more than 1,000 energy
ministers, oil bosses and other industry lu
minaries. Houston’s mayor, Sylvester Tur
ner, kicked off the proceedings by declar
ing that “asthe energy capital of the world,
we have a moral obligation to reduce car
bon emissions.” Shortly afterwards Amin
Nasser, chief executive of Saudi Aramco,
the world’s oil colossus, warned of infla
tion and social chaos unless countries ac
cept that “oil and gas will play an essential
role during the transition.” Between visits
to booths where oil companies from Aram
co to ExxonMobil, an American super
major, competed to appear lowercarbon
than rivals, attendees could be seen wring
ing their hands about falling capital spendH OUSTON
Why American oil companies
are different