Encyclopedia of Society and Culture in the Ancient World

(Sean Pound) #1
Th e admiral narrowly escaped being captured himself and
lost his fl agship. Aft er they were defeated by the Romans off
the coast of Sardinia, the Carthaginians crucifi ed Hannibal
as a punishment.
In addition to their navy, Carthaginians also had a large
merchant fl eet. Th eir vessels sailed the Mediterranean before
the First Punic War and through the wars until just before the
outbreak of the Th ird Punic War in 149 b.c.e. Th ese were the
ships involved in trade with Spain and Cornwall, where the
Carthaginians and the Phoenicians bought tin. Th e Roman
poet Avienus (fourth century c.e.) makes a reference to a visit
of the Carthaginian navigator Himilco (fl. ca. 450 b.c.e.) to
Cornwall. Carthaginian ships also sailed down the western
coast of Africa. Th ey are believed to have traded with West

Africa, although whether they did this directly or through
middlemen is not known. According to one theory, the Car-
thaginian navigator Hanno (fi ft h century b.c.e.) sailed to
modern-day Cameroon.
Apart from the Carthaginians, the Numidians had small
trading vessels, but as a client state fi rst of Carthage and then
of Rome they had no need for their own fl eet. Trading vessels
were certainly being built on the western coast of Africa, but
most traveled short distances and kept close to the coastline.
However, the Norwegian explorer Th or Heyerdahl (1914–
2002), in his Ra voyages in 1969 and 1970, managed to prove
to his skeptics that it was possible to build a vessel that could
cross the Atlantic Ocean. Archaeologists have not found the
remains of any of the Carthaginian trading vessels, but from
descriptions of the goods they carried it would seem that they
were similar to the Phoenician merchant ships. Th ese ships
relied far more on the use of sails, as the costs of maintaining
large numbers of oarsmen, even slaves, would have been too
high to justify the gains in speed and the loss of large storage
areas for merchandise.
Many small vessels undoubtedly traveled the eastern
coast of Africa, including Egyptian ships sailing to Punt, the
Egyptian name for a coastal region probably in modern-day
Eritrea and Djibouti. Merchants from these and other ships
were probably the transmitters of knowledge of metallurgy
from Nubia to southern Africa. Th e dates of the iron objects
found in Africa seem to show that the technical advances oc-
curred in coastal areas before permeating inland, which may
explain why the Buganda people of modern Uganda learned
to ut i lize iron in compa rat ively recent t imes. It is a lso possible
that this trade was carried out not by African ships but by
ships from India or elsewhere whose owners plied their wares
along the African coast. Items designed by the Chinese and
Indians have been found in Madagascar, indicating that this
trade did exist from ancient times. In addition, beginning in
the second century b.c.e. the use of dhows—sailing vessels
with triangular sails—for trade between Africa and southern
Arabia started to become important as the exchange of goods
between Axum and Arabia signifi cantly increased.
Besides the ships used for navigating in seas and oceans,
there was also a need for vessels for crossing rivers and trad-
ing along rivers. Raft s would have been used to cover the
shorter distances, along with boats made from hollowed logs
and small watercraft. Being made entirely of wood, none of
these have survived, although some archaeologists have sug-
gested hints of their existence in some of the rock carvings
found in the Sahel.

EGYPT


BY ERIN FAIRBURN


Because ancient Egyptian civilization developed in the valley
and the delta of the Nile River, it is only natural that water-
craft appeared early in Egyptian history. Developed technol-
ogy in the creation of river craft appeared in the Predynastic

The Ra expeditions of the Norwegian explorer Thor
Heyerdahl, which took place in 1969 and 1970, fol-
lowed the Norwegian adventurer’s success with the
Kon-Tiki crossing of the Pacifi c. Heyerdahl intended
to demonstrate that it was also possible for people
to cross the Atlantic Ocean. He had been interested
in connections between the ancient civilizations, and
he believed it might have been possible for seacraft to
have made the long and hazardous voyages.
For that reason Heyerdahl hired boat builders
from Lake Chad, and the boat was constructed out
of reeds in Egypt based on designs shown in ancient
Egyptian drawings, and then taken to Safi , Morocco.
It was accepted that the Egyptians could have sailed
along the coastline of North Africa and through the
Strait of Gibraltar. Here they might have taken on
extra crew or replenished supplies on the boat. Al-
though Heyerdahl’s intent was to show that ancient
Egyptians could have reached the Americas, the fact
that the boat departed from the Atlantic Coast of
Morocco also showed that people before even the
Carthaginians could have made the journey.
With a seven-man crew, Ra sailed on May 25,
1969, but foundered in July after traveling 2,700
miles. It was abandoned after being waterlogged and
in danger of sinking. It was a great disappointment
for Heyerdahl and the multinational crew, but, unde-
terred, the team started work on another boat. The
second boat, Ra II, with almost the same crew, was
built by Aymara Indians from Lake Titicaca on the
border of Peru and Bolivia. It was then taken to Safi ,
from where it managed to cross the Atlantic and ar-
rive at Bridgetown, Barbados, in the West Indies in
1970, having completed the crossing in 57 days.

THE RA EXPEDITIONS OF
THOR HEYERDAHL

ships and shipbuilding: Egypt 975

0895-1194_Soc&Culturev4(s-z).i975 975 10/10/07 2:30:37 PM

Free download pdf