The Politically IncorrectGuide toIslam(and the Crusades)wh ic h re qu ir es th at on ly th at par t of th e ea rt h wh er e th e fo ll ow er s of
Is la m ar e re si di ng re ma in se cu re. Th e pe ac e wh ic h Is la m de si re s is
th atthe rel igi on (i. e. the law of the soc iet y] be pur ifi ed for God , tha t the
obe die nc e of al l pe op le be fo r Go d al on e, an d th at so me pe op le sh ou ld
n otbe lor ds ove r oth ers. Aft er the per iod of the Pro phet —pea ce he on
him---only the fin al sta ges of the move men t ofJih adare to be fol low ed:
the initial or middle stages are not applicable.'
In ot he r wo rd s, Is la m is a re li gi on of th e pe ac e th at wi ll co me wh en
eve ry one is Mus li m or at le ast sub je ct to th e Isl ami c st ate. And to est ab-
lish that peace. Muslims must wage war.Just Like Today: Chechen jihadists cite Islamic law on jihad
Islamic legaltreatises enjoining jihaddo not gather dust onthe shelf,Jihadists usethemto convi nce
recru its that they need to fulfi ll their respo nsibil ity as Musli ms by wagin g waragainst
unbelievers. One example of this camein late 2003 fromtheShariah Council of the StateDefense
Council (Majlis al-Shura) of the ChechenRepublic of Ichkeria.In its underground publication Jihad
Today, the Sharia Council publishedanarticle titled "Jihadandits Solution Today" in itthree of
the four main schools of Sunni jurisprudence were cited to argue forjihadagainst theRussiansin
Chechnya:
First,whatisJihad?
HanbaliSchooldefined it asspendingpower and energy inthe war in thewayof Allah by
persona[participation,property,word, etc.
MalikiSchoolconsidersit a war abattle ofa Muslim witha Kafir {an infidel) whohasno
treaty. toexalt the WordofAllah, orwho trespassedon theterritories ofMuslims.
Hanbalis say thatthis isa war againstKafirs (theinfidels. unlike anarmed fight withthe Muslims
bordering on beingrebels.or brigands or robbers for an example.Mugni-Muhtaj,,vol. 6, page4)4?