Fig.76Then there is the stele bearing the name ‘Khaf’ standing between the paws of the Sphinx itself
(fig.77). This granite stele was erected to commemorate restoration work that was done on the
monument by King Thutmose IV sometime between 1425 and 1417 BC. That this single syllable
of ‘Khaf’ that appears on the stele should give Egyptologists reason to believe Khafre was the
builder is somewhat bizarre because the very same stele also describes the entire Giza Necropolis
as being a ‘Splendid Place of the First Time’ which of course associates the whole complex a far
earlier epoch in Egypt’s history.
There is also another stele at Giza called ‘the Inventory Stele’ which mentions Khufu building
a temple and also mentions the Great Pyramid as being next to the Sphinx, which also indicates
that both the sphinx and the pyramid were already there before Khufu’s time.
Naturally, Egyptologists have branded the Inventory stele as a forgery because it is contrary to
the orthodox theory, though they neglect to indicate who they think may have forged a 4500 year
old stone stele or why. This same extraordinary approach has been seen with other stele as well,
as in the case of the king list in which the bottom half of the list is said and has been proven to be
genuine but the top half is said to be either a ‘forgery’ or ‘mythology’ or ‘mistaken.’
One of the main anchor points for the theory that Khufu was the builder the Great pyramid lies
with an inscription bearing his name that was found in a small antechamber within the pyramid
that had long been sealed. This inscription was seized upon as proof but has always been highly
suspect and has been now confirmed as a forgery yet it is still used to validate the theory. The
story of the inscription goes like this:
In 1837 a man by the name of Colonel Howard Vyse and two companions claimed to have
found the remains of the Pharaoh Menkara inside the smaller Giza Pyramid thus proving at last
who built it. However the real fact of the matter is that the mummy was a fraud, consisting of a
2000 year old coffin and some bones from the Christian era which had been assembled into a
fraudulent ‘discovery.’ This fact is widely known by scholars and cannot be disputed by anyone
yet it is almost never publicized. The fact that the inscription found inside the antechamber of the
great pyramid was also found by Colonel Vyse in the same year should immediately give one
pause, and yet we find that this fact is absolutely never publicized. Why?
The forgery of the inscription has actually now been positively confirmed by the great-
grandson of a man who witnessed the actual event! The suspect nature of the inscription was
mentioned by the Sumerian scholar Zechariah Sitchin in his book ‘The Stairway to Heaven’. A