15 • 34
Country
Concept of Independence
Functions Generally Not Allowed
North and South AmericaArgentina
Based on an objective definition of lack of independence, as
Company employee, partner, chairman, manager, consort or
opposed to general requirement of independence
consanguinity relationship up to fourth degree of the com-pany authorities.
Canada
Defined by rules of professional conduct of the
Provincial
Serving in any function that lessens independence, taking part
Institute of Chartered Accountants and by incorporating acts.
in decision making in a management consultant engagement,
GAAS requires
the audit to be carried out
with
an objective
auditing a corporation where stock in the client is owned
state of mind.
The rules and conduct of Certified General
Accountants require public practitioners to be independent.
Mexico
Prohibits a public accountant from acting as an auditor of a
Not available.
corporation when circumstances exist that may impair his orher objectivity and reduce his or her mental independence orgive such an impression to the public. Statutory auditors areconsidered to be independent.
United States
Must meet standards of independence in both fact and
The functions generally not allowed are described in the
appearance.
ET Section of the AICPA Professional Standards. Recentlypassed Sarbannes-Oxley legislation further defines indepen-dence to include a requirement that the auditor of publicly-owned companies not be allowed to provide consultingservices and to add new requirement for the companies’audit committees.
EuropeThe Netherlands
In recent Dutch auditing literature, independence is described
The auditor cannot undertake any work affecting in
depen-
as functional independence, financial independence, and
dence or impartiality (i.e., acting in a managerial capacity,
relational and mental independence.
accepting an executive appointment in business or industry,or acting as an insurance agent or broker).
United Kingdom
Ethical guidance of RSB’s emphasizes responsibility of auditor
The auditor must not be a director, partner or a shareholder of
to avoid conflict of interest or compromise of independence;
a client company; must not hold close personal relationship
gives examples of situations likely to cause conflict.
with a director, partner or shareholder.
Professional persons must be, and must be seen to be, inde-pendent. The concept of ‘independence’ is not defined in lawor standards.