because it helps explain what is happening in North American institutions of
higher learning as well as in the NAWA ones to which I will soon turn.
A final point remains to be made to complete the problematizing of this
dichotomous spectrum between confessional/theological and modern academic
study of religions. The emergence of the modern academic study of religions
in NAWA is linked to Europe and North America because of their colonial
and post-colonial history in the region. If we call this study of religions
‘academic’, then it assumes an ‘academic’ framework within which it operates.
This framework is that of university institutions or research centers. How this
particular form of academic institution came to develop in NAWA is not only
a question of relatively recent colonial history; it is also a question of how
post-colonial treatment of higher education took shape in newly independent
nation-states whose imagined pre-modern traditions were integrated differently
from institution to institution and from country to country. The result is a
coexistence, within sometimes the same university walls, of widely different
hermeneutical frameworks for interpreting religions, not to mention the degree
of openness or not to using other disciplines in the search to understand
religions better.
The development of the modern academic study of religions
The development of the modern academic study of religions in NAWA is linked
to two aspects within the broader transformations taking place within modern
education in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: (a) the variety of insti-
tutions, and (b) the specific question of the relationship between theology (or
shar¥‘ahin Islam and halakhahin Judaism) and the academic study of religions
that grew mostly outside and in opposition to European and North American
Christian religious institutions of higher learning.
There are four different kinds of institutions in NAWA, each with its unique
historical genealogy: (1) transformed pre-modern educational institutions; (2)
universities that grew from missionary institutions; (3) national universities
within newly independent nation-states; and (4) private institutions of higher
learning that have multiplied tremendously in the last decade or so. In most
NAWA countries, a mix of these four kinds of institutions exists. I will provide
a few examples of each in order to reflect not only the complexity but also
the interdependence between these four kinds of genealogies in educational
institutions of higher learning.
Transformed pre-modern educational institutions
The most famous example of a transformed pre-modern educational institution
is Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. Founded in 970 CE, this institution has
90
PATRICE BRODEUR