In recent years, the Indic Studies Project, located at the Centre for Developing
Societies in Delhi (CSDS), has been launched by the well-known Indian feminist
and writer Madhu Kishwar along with others in collaboration with Infinity
Foundation (New Jersey, USA). The first international conference on religions
and cultures in the Indic civilization was hosted jointly by CSDS and the
International Association for the History of Religions in 2003. It was signi-
ficantly supported by Infinity Foundation, which hosted the second conference
in 2005. Several speakers and participants at these two conferences openly and
clearly espoused Hindu right-wing ideologies.
The Infinity Foundation is closely linked with the Hindu American
Foundation, which was recently at the forefront of the Californian textbook
battle, attempting to revise sixth grade textbooks seen to be making biased
remarks against Hinduism. Several Dalit and secular organizations, together
with South Asian scholars from different universities, opposed the revision
move. The case finally went to Court, which ruled in favor of retaining the
original texts. Many scholars were deeply troubled by the attempt of Hindu
groups to write out protest, resistance and uncomfortable truths from
Hinduism’s past. As we have seen, scholarship in India, particularly in history,
has been fraught by somewhat similar battles in recent times.
Studies of other religious communities
As mentioned earlier, as a result of established paradigms, non-Hindu
communities have often tended to be viewed in the first instance through the
categories employed for the study of Hinduism. Thus, in the initial stages of
research into Muslim and other communities, one of the first questions to be
raised was: is there caste in non-Hindu communities? (Ahmad [ed.] 1973).
Ahmad pioneered studies into the world of Muslim communities, and
enunciated his ideas in Contributions to Indian Sociology(1972), where he
stated that greater attention must be paid to non-Hindu communities to build
a comprehensive sociology of India.
Despite this initiative, the paradigms of debate did not at first alter radically.
Certain forms of ritual such as life-crisis rituals came in for a good deal of
attention (Ahmad [ed.] 1978), perhaps because they could be more easily
captured by the conceptual category of ‘syncretism’. This perspective allowed
for the idea that Islam (or Christianity) in India was somehow not quite
authentic. It appeared that the most important feature of these religions was
their syncretic character, marked in the first instance by the ‘adoption’ of caste.
It is interesting, though perhaps not inexplicable, that interest in Muslims,
Christians or Sikhs has often developed in relation to their importance vis-à-
vis Hindu society, usually due to conflict. Hence, studies of Muslims, especially
among historians, figured for a long while in the area of the politics of
132
ROWENA ROBINSON AND VINEETA SINHA