religious or even specific theological allegiances. In like manner, given the right
circumstances, one may be fortunate to supplement one’s familiarity with
Richard Trexler’s work on reverence and profanity in the study of religion
with the observation of the reverential attitude that perhaps prevails among
one’s colleagues. In short, however dangerous or deplorable or merely alien,
the cases just mentioned should remind us that dealing with religion is more
than dealing with the history of ideas or with colorful practices in exotic
locations, from which one is always able to return to the safety of modernity.
Confronting these cases forces us to engage in a second order reflection about
modernity, for it is within modernity that these concerns with promoting one’s
religious identity occur, in some cases simply as attempts to ensure institutional
survival in an unforgiving market; just as it is only within the horizon of
modernity that the solicitousness for one’s and others’ Otherness can thrive.
Theoretical approaches
At its best, reflexivity leads to the exploration of the many ways in which
‘religion’ has been understood in the history of the West; to placing the
scholarship on religion in its proper historical context; and to the investigation
of the extent to which terms in other cultures parallel Western ‘religion’. While
there is no North American equivalent of Hans-Michael Haussig’s Der
Religionsbegriff in den Religionen(1999), the first two tasks have been fulfilled
in an exemplary manner by Michel Despland in works such as La religion
en Occident(1979) and L’Émergence des Sciences de la religion(1999).
Unfortunately, the fact that these books have been written in French has led
to their neglect by some of those who, despite professing to have an interest
in the ‘construction’ of this contested subject, routinely ignore work that is
not available in English. Historical awareness also characterizes Ivan Strenski’s
work, most recently in Thinking about Religion(2006). Strenski’s earlier Four
Theories of Myth in Twentieth-Century History(1987) includes one of the
first discussions in English of Mircea Eliade’s right-wing political activities in
Romania during the 1930s. His Contesting Sacrifice(2002) shows how an
apparently neutral concept such as ‘sacrifice’ functioned in France from the
early modern age into the twentieth century, contributing to the slaughter of
the 1914–1918 war. The realization that scholarship on religion has been
intimately connected with political developments of a frequently reactionary
kind has been explored in a number of publications. Significant among them
is Steven Wasserstrom’s Religion after Religion(1999), a study of the scholars
associated with the Eranos conferences, particularly Gershom Scholem, Eliade,
and Henry Corbin. Despite its many virtues, Wasserstrom’s book should be
read with some caution, as the author’s righteous indignation results in some
unjustified indictments; regrettable also is Wasserstrom’s lack of reflexivity
248
GUSTAVO BENAVIDES