Interaction prior to confounding:
If strong interaction, then
confounding irrelevant
Assess interaction before confounding
Interaction may not be of interest:
Skip interaction stage
Proceed directly to
confounding
Interaction assessment is carried out next,
prior to the assessment of confounding. The
reason for this ordering is that if there is strong
evidence of interaction involving certain vari-
ables, then the assessment of confounding
involving these variables becomes irrelevant.
For example, suppose we are assessing the effect
of an exposure variableEon some diseaseD,and
we find strong evidence thatgenderis an effect
modifier of theE–Drelationship. In particular,
suppose that the odds ratio for the effect ofEon
Dis 5.4 for males but only 1.2 for females. In
other words, the data indicate that theE–Drela-
tionship is different for males than for females,
that is, there is interaction due to gender.
For this situation, it wouldnotbe appropriate
to combine the two odds ratio estimates for
males and females into a single overall adjusted
estimate, say 3.5, that represents an “average”
of the male and female odds ratios. Such an
overall “average” is used to control for the con-
founding effect of gender in the absence of
interaction; however, if interaction is present,
the use of a single adjusted estimate is a mis-
leading statistic because it masks the finding of
a separate effect for males and females.
Thus, we recommend that if one wishes to assess
interaction and also consider confounding, then
the assessment of interaction comes first.
However, the circumstances of the study may
indicate that the assessment of interaction is
not of interest or is biologically unimportant.
In such situations, the interaction stage of the
strategy can then be skipped, and one proceeds
directly to the assessment of confounding.
For example, the goal of a study may be to
obtain asingleoverall estimate of the effect of
an exposure adjusted for several factors,
regardless of whether or not there is interaction
involving these factors. In such a case, then,
interaction assessment is not appropriate.
EXAMPLE
Supposegenderis effect modifier for
E–Drelationship:
OR males = 5.4, OR females = 1.2
interaction
Overall average¼ 3 : 5
not appropriate
Misleading because of separate effects
for males and females
EXAMPLE
Study goal: single overall estimate.
Then interaction not appropriate
170 6. Modeling Strategy Guidelines