Presentation
I. Overview
FOCUS
Assessing
confounding
and interaction
Valid estimate
of E–D
relationship
Three stages:
(1) Variable specification
(2) Interaction
(3) Confounding/precision
Initial model: HWF
EViVj
in initial
model
!
EVi;EVj;
Vi;Vj;ViVj
also in model
Hierarchical backward elimination:
Can test for interaction,butnot
confounding
Can eliminate lower order term
if corresponding higher order
term is not significant
This presentation describes a strategy for
assessing interaction and confounding when
carrying out mathematical modeling using
logistic regression. The goal of the strategy is
to obtain a valid estimate of an exposure–
disease relationship that accounts for con-
founding and effect modification.
In the previous presentation on modeling strat-
egy guidelines, we recommended a modeling
strategy with three stages: (1)variable specifi-
cation, (2)interaction assessment, and (3)con-
founding assessmentfollowed by consideration
ofprecision.
The initial model is required to behierarchi-
cally well formulated, which we denote as
HWF. This means that the initial model must
contain all lower order components of any
term in the model.
Thus, for example, if the model contains an
interaction term of the formEViVj, this will
require the lower order termsEVi,EVj,Vi,Vj,
andViVjalso to be in the initial model.
Given an initial model that is HWF, the recom-
mended strategy then involves ahierarchical
backward elimination procedurefor removing
variables. In carrying out this strategy, statisti-
cal testing is allowed for interaction terms but
not for confounding terms. Note that although
any lower order component of a higher order
term must belong to the initial HWF model,
such a component might be dropped from the
model eventually if its corresponding higher
order term is found to be nonsignificant during
the backward elimination process.
206 7. Modeling Strategy for Assessing Interaction and Confounding