Because CAT is the exposure variable, we must
leave CAT in all further models regardless of
the hierarchy principle. In addition, CHL and
HPT are the twoVs that must remain in all
further models.
This leaves theVvariables AGE, SMK, and
ECG as still being candidates for elimination
as possible nonconfounders.
As described earlier, one approach to assessing
whether AGE, SMK, and ECG are nonconfoun-
ders is to determine whether the coefficients in
the odds ratio expression for the CAT, CHD
relationship change meaningfully as we drop
one or more of the candidate terms AGE, SMK,
and ECG.
The odds ratio expression for the CAT, CHD
relationship is shown here. This expression
containsb^, the coefficient of the CAT variable,
plus two terms of the form^dtimesW, where the
Ws are the effect modifiers CHL and HPT that
remain as a result of interaction assessment.
The gold standard odds ratio expression is
derived from the model remaining after inter-
action assessment. This model controls for all
potential confounders, that is, theVs, in the
initial model. For the Evans County data, the
coefficients in this odds ratio, which are
obtained from the printout above, areb^equals
12.6894, ^d 1 equals 0.0692, and ^d 2 equals
2.3318.
The table shown here provides the odds ratio
coefficients^b;^d 1 , and^d 2 for different subsets of
AGE, SMK, and ECG in the model. The first
row of coefficients is for the gold standard
model, which contains all fiveVs. The next
row shows the coefficients obtained when
SMK is dropped from the model, and so on
down to the last row which shows the coeffi-
cients obtained when AGE, SMK, and ECG are
simultaneously removed from the model so
that only CHL and HPT are controlled.
EXAMPLE (continued)
Thus, retain CAT, CHL, and HPT in all
further models
Candidates for elimination:
AGE, SMK, ECG
Assessing confounding:
Do coefficients inOR expressiond
change?
ORd¼expð^bþ^d 1 CHLþ^d 2 HPTÞ;
where
^b¼coefficient of CAT
^d 1 ¼coefficient of CC¼CATCHL
^d 2 ¼coefficient of CH¼CATHPT
Gold standardOR (alld Vs):
ORd¼expð^bþ^d 1 CHLþ^d 2 HPTÞ;
where
^b¼ 12 : 6894 ;^d 1 ¼ 0 : 0692 ;^d 2
¼ 2 : 3318
Viin model ^b ^d 1 ^d 2
All fiveV
variables
12.6894 0.0692 2.3318
CHL, HPT,
AGE, ECG
12.7285 0.0697 2.3836
CHL, HPT,
AGE, SMK
12.8447 0.0707 2.3334
CHL, HPT,
ECG, SMK
12.5684 0.0697 2.2081
CHL, HPT, AGE 12.7879 0.0707 2.3796
CHL, HPT, ECG 12.6850 0.0703 2.2590
CHL, HPT, SMK 12.7198 0.0712 2.2210
CHL, HPT 12.7411 0.0713 2.2613
226 7. Modeling Strategy for Assessing Interaction and Confounding