Logistic Regression: A Self-learning Text, Third Edition (Statistics in the Health Sciences)

(vip2019) #1

  1. Suppose the following initial model is specified for
    assessing the effect of type of hospital (HT), consid-
    ered as the exposure variable, on the prevalence of
    surgical wound infection, controlling for the other
    four variables on the above list:
    logit PðXÞ¼aþbHTþg 1 HSþg 2 CTþg 3 AGEþg 4 SEX
    þd 1 HTAGEþd 2 HTSEX:
    Describe how to test for the overall significance (a
    “chunk” test) of the interaction terms. In answering
    this, describe the null hypothesis, the full and reduced
    models, the form of the test statistic, and its distribu-
    tion under the null hypothesis.

  2. Using the model given in Exercise 1, describe briefly
    how to carry out a backward elimination procedure to
    assess interaction.

  3. Briefly describe how to carry out interaction assess-
    ment for the model described in Exercise 1. (In
    answering this, it is suggested you make use of the
    tests described in Exercises 1 and 2.)

  4. Suppose the interaction assessment stage for the
    model in Example 1 finds no significant interaction
    terms. What is the formula for the odds ratio for the
    effect of HT on the prevalence of surgical wound infec-
    tion at the end of the interaction assessment stage?
    WhatVterms remain in the model at the end of inter-
    action assessment? Describe how you would evaluate
    which of theseVterms should be controlled as con-
    founders.

  5. Considering the scenario described in Exercise 4 (i.e.,
    no interaction terms found significant), suppose you
    determine that the variables CT and AGE do not need
    to be controlled for confounding. Describe how you
    would consider whether dropping both variables will
    improve precision.

  6. Suppose the interaction assessment stage finds that
    the interaction terms HTAGE and HTSEX are
    both significant. Based on this result, what is the for-
    mula for the odds ratio that describes the effect of HT
    on the prevalence of surgical wound infection?

  7. For the scenario described in Example 6, and making
    use of the hierarchy principle, whatVterms are eligi-
    ble to be dropped as possible nonconfounders?

  8. Describe briefly how you would assess confounding
    for the model considered in Exercises 6 and 7.

  9. Suppose that the variable CT is determined to be a
    nonconfounder, whereas all otherVvariables in the
    model (of Exercise 1) need to be controlled. Describe


Practice Exercises 235
Free download pdf