briefly how you would assess whether the variable CT
needs to be controlled for precision reasons.
- What problems are associated with the assessment of
confounding and precision described in Exercises
8 and 9?
Test The following questions consider the use of logistic regres-
sion on data obtained from a matched case-control study
of cervical cancer in 313 women from Sydney, Australia
(Brock et al., 1988). The outcome variable is cervical can-
cer status (1¼present, 0¼absent). The matching vari-
ables are age and socioeconomic status. Additional
independent variables not matched on are smoking status,
number of lifetime sexual partners, and age at first sexual
intercourse. The independent variables are listed below
together with their computer abbreviation and coding
scheme.
Variable Abbreviation Coding
Smoking status SMK 1 ¼ever, 0¼never
Number of sexual
partners
NS 1 ¼ 4 þ,0¼0–3
Age at first intercourse AS 1 ¼ 20 þ,0¼ 19
Age of subject AGE Category matched
Socioeconomic status SES Category matched
Assume that at the end of the variable specification stage,
the followingE,V,Wmodel has been defined as the initial
model to be considered:
logit PðXÞ¼aþbSMKþ~g*iVi*þg 1 NSþg 2 AS
þg 3 NSASþd 1 SMKNSþd 2 SMKAS
þd 3 SMKNSAS;
where theV*iare dummy variables indicating matching
strata, theg*i are the coefficients of theVi*variables,
SMK is the only exposure variable of interest, and the
variables NS, AS, AGE, and SES are being considered
for control.
- For the above model, which variables are interaction
terms? - For the above model, list the steps you would take to
assess interaction using a hierarchically backward
elimination approach. - Assume that at the end of interaction assessment, the
only interaction term found significant is the product
term SMKNS. What variables are left in the model at
236 7. Modeling Strategy for Assessing Interaction and Confounding