Simple Analysis
E¼ 1 E¼ 0
D¼ 1 ab
D¼ 0 cd
Risk: only in follow-up
OR: case-control or cross-sectional
ORc¼ad=bc
Case-control and cross-sectional
studies:
¼
^PðÞE¼ 1 jD¼ 1.
^PðÞE¼ 0 jD¼ 1
^PðÞE¼ 1 jD¼ 0.
^PðÞE¼ 0 jD¼ 0
P(E|D) (general form)
P(E=1 | D=1)
P(E=1 | D=0)
ˆ
ˆ
Risk:PðÞDjE
RRc¼
P^ðÞD¼ 1 jE¼ 1
P^ðÞD¼ 1 jE¼ 0
The fact that only odds ratios, not individual
risks, can be estimated from logistic modeling
in case-control or cross-sectional studies is not
surprising. This phenomenon is a carryover of
a principle applied to simpler data analysis
situations, in particular, to the simple analysis
of a 22 table, as shown here.
For a 22 table,risk estimatescan be usedonly
if the data derive from a follow-up study,
whereas only odds ratios are appropriate if
the data derive from a casecontrol or cross-
sectional study.
To explain this further, recall that for 2 2
tables, the odds ratio is calculated asORcequals
atimesdoverbtimesc, wherea,b,c, anddare
the cell frequencies inside the table.
In case-control and cross-sectional studies, this
OR formula can alternatively be written, as
shown here, as a ratio involving probabilities
for exposure status conditional on disease status.
In this formula, for example, the term
^PðE¼ 1 jD¼ 1 Þis the estimated probability of
being exposed, given that you are diseased. Sim-
ilarly, the expression^PðE¼ 1 jD¼ 0 Þis the esti-
mated probability of being exposed given that
you are not diseased. All the probabilities in this
expression are of the general form P(E|D).
In contrast, in follow-up studies, formulae for
risk estimates are of the form P(D|E), in which
the exposure and disease variables have been
switched to the opposite side of the “given” sign.
For example, the risk ratio formula for follow-
up studies is shown here. Both the numerator
and denominator in this expression are of the
form P(D|E).
Presentation: V. Study Design Issues 13