Answers to
Practice
Exercises
- a. X¼(CAT¼1, AGE¼50, CHL¼200, ECG¼0,
SMK¼0, HPT¼0)
P^ðXÞ¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½logitP^ðX*Þg,
where
logitP^ðX*Þ¼ 4 : 0497 þð 12 : 6894 Þð 1 Þþ 0 : 0350 ð 50 Þ
þð 0 : 00545 Þð 200 Þþ: 3671 ð 0 Þþ 0 : 7732 ð 0 Þ
þ 1 : 0466 ð 0 Þþ 0 : 0692 ð 1 Þð 200 Þ
þð 2 : 3318 Þð 1 Þð 0 Þ
b. logitP^ðX*Þ¼ 2 : 2391
P^ðX*Þ¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½logit^PðX*Þg
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ 2 : 2391 g¼ 0 : 096
c. Cut-point¼0.200
SinceP^ðX*Þ¼ 0 : 096 < 0 : 200 , we would predict sub-
jectX* to be a noncase.
d. If the cut-point is 0 and there is at least one true
case, than every case in the dataset will have
P^ðX*Þ> 0 , i.e., all 71 true cases will exceed the
cut-point and therefore be predicted to be cases.
Thus, the sensitivity percent is 100(71/71)¼100.
e. It is not possible that an increase in the cut-point
could result in a decrease in the specificity.
f. The denominator for computing 1 minus the speci-
ficity is the number of true noncases (538), whereas
the denominator for the false positive percentage in
the SAS output is the number of persons classified
as positive (74). Thus, we obtain different results as
follows:
Percentage specificity¼(100)(1Sp)¼(100)43/
538 ¼8%, whereas
Percentage false positive¼(100)43/74¼58.1%.
- a. AUC¼c¼0.789. Grade C, i.e., fair discrimination.
b. 38,198¼ 71 538, where 71 is the number of true
cases and 538 is the number of true noncases.
Thus, 38,198 is the number of distinct case/non-
case pairs in the dataset.
c. Percent Concordant¼ 100 w/np, where w is the
number of case/noncase pairs for which the case
has a higher predicted probability than the noncase
andnpis the total number of case/noncase pairs
(38,198).
Percent Tied¼ 100 z/np, wherezis the number of
case/noncase pairs for which the case has the same
predicted probability as the noncase.
386 10. Assessing Discriminatory Performance of a Binary Logistic Model