Using the above (option 1) interaction model,
we can assess interaction of exposure with the
matching variables by testing the null hypoth-
esis that all the coefficients of theEV 1 iterms
(i.e., all thed 1 i) are equal to zero.
If this “chunk” test is not significant, we could
conclude that there is no interaction involving
the matching variables. If the test is significant,
we might then carry out backward elimination
to determine which of theEV 1 iterms need to
stay in the model. (We could also carry out
backward elimination even if the “chunk” test
is nonsignificant.)
A criticism of this (option 1) approach is that if
significant interaction is found, then it will be
difficult to determine which of possibly several
matching variables are effect modifiers. This is
because the dummy variables (V 1 i) in the
model represent matching strata rather than
specific effect modifier variables.
Another problem with option 1 is that there
may not be enough data in each stratum (e.g.,
when pair-matching) to assess interaction. In
fact, if there are more parameters in the model
than there are observations in the study, the
model will not execute.
A second option for assessing interaction
involving matching variables is to consider
product terms of the formEW1m, where
W1mis an actual matching variable.
The corresponding logistic model is shown at
the left. This model contains the exposure vari-
ableE, dummy variablesV 1 ifor the matching
strata, nonmatched covariates V 2 j, product
termsEW1minvolving the matching vari-
ables, andEWkterms, where theWkare
effect modifiers defined from the unmatched
covariates.
EXAMPLE (continued)
Option 1:
TestH 0 : Alld 1 i¼0.
(Chunk test)
Not significant)No interaction
involving matching
variables
Significant)Interaction involving
matching variables
)Carry out backward
elimination of
EV 1 iterms
Criticisms of option 1:
Difficult to determine which of
several matching variables are
effect modifiers. (TheV 1 i
represent matching strata, not
matching variables.)
Not enough data to assess
interaction (number of
parameters may exceedn).
Option 2:
Add product terms of the form
EW 1 m;
whereW1mis amatching variable
logitPðXÞ¼aþbE¼~
i
g 1 iV 1 iþ~
j
g 2 jV 2 j
þE~
m
d 1 mW 1 m
þE~
k
dkWk;
where
W1m¼matching variables in original
form
W 2 k¼effect modifiers defined from
other covariates (not matched)
Presentation: VI. Assessing Interaction Involving Matching Variables 405