Model for three categories, one
predictor (X 1 = AGEGP):
ln
PðD¼ 1 jX 1 Þ
PðD¼ 0 jX 1 Þ
¼a 1 þb 11 X 1
ln
PðD¼ 2 jX 1 Þ
PðD¼ 0 jX 1 Þ
¼a 2 þb 21 X 1
2 vs. 0
1 vs. 0
a 1 b 11
a 2 b 21
III. Odds Ratio with Three
Categories
^a 1 ^a 2
b^ 11 b^ 21
)
Estimates obtained
as in SLR
Special case for one predictor
whereX 1 ¼1orX 1 ¼ 0
Because our example has three outcome cate-
gories and one predictor (i.e., AGEGP), our
polytomous model requires two regression
expressions. One expression gives the log of
the probability that the outcome is in category
1 divided by the probability that the outcome is
in category 0, which equalsa 1 plusb 11 timesX 1.
We are alsosimultaneouslymodeling the log of
the probability that the outcome is in category
2 divided by the probability that the outcome is
in category 0, which equalsa 2 plusb 21 timesX 1.
Both the alpha and beta terms have a subscript
to indicate which comparison is being made
(i.e., category 1 vs. 0 or category 2 vs. 0).
Once a polytomous logistic regression model
has been fit and the parameters (intercepts
and beta coefficients) have been estimated,
we can then calculate estimates of the disease–
exposure association in a similar manner to the
methods used in standard logistic regression
(SLR).
Consider the special case in which the only
independent variable is the exposure variable
and the exposure is coded 0 and 1. To assess
the effect of the exposure on the outcome, we
compareX 1 ¼1toX 1 ¼0.
Presentation: III. Odds Ratio with Three Categories 437