In general, with longitudinal data,
independent variables may be
either
- Time-dependent
or - Time-independent
Outcome variable generally varies
within a cluster
Goal of analysis: to account for out-
come variation within and between
clusters
Model for Infant Care Study:
logit PðD¼ 1 jXÞ¼b 0 þb 1 BIRTHWGT
þb 2 GENDER
þb 3 DIARRHEA
GEE Model(GENMOD output)
Variable Coefficient
Empirical
Std Err
Wald
p-value
INTERCEPT 1.3978 1.1960 0.2425
BIRTHWGT 0.0005 0.0003 0.1080
GENDER 0.0024 0.5546 0.9965
DIARRHEA 0.2214 0.8558 0.7958
Interpretation of GEE model simi-
lar to SLR
OR estimates
Confidence intervals
Wald test statistics
9
=
;
Use same
formulas
Underlying assumptions
Method of parameter
estimation
9
=
;
Differ
Odds ratio
ORdðDIARRHEA¼ 1 vs:DIARRHEA¼ 0 Þ
¼expð 0 : 2214 Þ¼ 1 : 25
In general, with longitudinal data, independent
variables may or may not vary within a cluster.
A time-dependent variable can vary in value,
whereas a time-independent variable does
not. The values of theoutcome variable, in
general, will vary within a cluster.
A correlated analysis attempts to account for
the variation of the outcome from both within
and between clusters.
We state the model for the Infant Care Study
example in logit form as shown on the left.
In this chapter, we use the notation b 0 to
represent the intercept rather thana,asais
commonly used to represent the correlation
parameters in a GEE model.
Next, the output obtained from running a GEE
model using the GENMOD procedure in SAS is
presented. This model accounts for the corre-
lations among the monthly outcome within
each of the 136 infant clusters. Odds ratio esti-
mates, confidence intervals, and Wald test
statistics are obtained using the GEE model
output in the same manner (i.e., with the
same formulas) as we have shown previously
using output generated from running a stan-
dard logistic regression. The interpretation of
these measures is also the same. What differs
between the GEE and standard logistic regres-
sion models are the underlying assumptions
and how the parameters and their variances
are estimated.
The odds ratio comparing symptoms of diar-
rhea vs. no diarrhea is calculated using the
usual e to the^bformula, yielding an estimated
odds ratio of 1.25.
Presentation: II. An Example (Infant Care Study) 495