- For SOC¼1, SBP¼150, and SMK¼1, X¼(SOC,
SBP, SMK, SOCSBP, SOCSMK)¼(1, 150, 1, 150, 1)
and
Model 1 ;P^ðXÞ¼ 1 =ð 1 þexpf½ 1 : 18 0 : 52 ð 1 Þ
þ 0 : 04 ð 150 Þ 0 : 56 ð 1 Þ
0 : 033 ð 1 150 Þ 0 : 175 ð 1 1 ÞgÞ:
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ð 1 : 035 Þg
¼ 1 =ð 1 þ 2 : 815 Þ
¼ 0 : 262 - ForModel 2, person 1(SOC¼1, SMK¼1, SBP¼150):
^PðXÞ¼ 1 =ð 1 þexpf½ 1 : 19 0 : 50 ð 1 Þ
þ 0 : 01 ð 150 Þ 0 : 42 ð 1 ÞgÞ
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ð 0 : 61 Þg
¼ 1 =ð 1 þ 1 : 84 Þ
¼ 0 : 352
ForModel 2, person2(SOC¼0,SMK¼1, SBP¼150):
^PðXÞ¼ 1 =ð 1 þexpf½ 1 : 19 0 : 50 ð 0 Þ
þ 0 : 01 ð 150 Þ 0 : 42 ð 1 ÞgÞ
¼ 1 =f 1 þexp½ð 0 : 11 Þg
¼ 1 =ð 1 þ 1 : 116 Þ
¼ 0 : 473 - The risk computed forModel 1is 0.262, whereas the
risk computed forModel 2, person 1is 0.352. Note that
both risks are computed for the same person (i.e.,
SOC¼1, SMK¼1, SBP¼150), yet they yield
different values because the models are different. In
particular,Model 1contains two product terms that
are not contained in Model 2, and consequently,
computed risks for a given person can be expected to
be somewhat different for different models. - UsingModel 2results,
RRð1vs: 2 Þ¼
PðSOC¼ 0 ;SMK¼ 1 ;SBP¼ 150 Þ
PðSOC¼ 1 ;SMK¼ 1 ;SBP¼ 150 Þ
¼ 0 : 352 = 0 : 473 ¼ 1 = 1 : 34 ¼ 0 : 744
This estimated risk ratio is less than 1 because the risk
for high social class persons (SOC¼1) is less than the
risk for low social class persons (SOC¼0) in this data
set. More specifically, the risk for low social class
persons is 1.34 times as large as the risk for high social
class persons.38 1. Introduction to Logistic Regression