226 Interpersonal Theory of Personality
Brokaw, D. W., & McLemore, C. W. (1991). Interpersonal models of
personality and psychopathology. In D. G. Gilbert & J. J.
Connolly (Eds.),Personality, social skills, and psychopathology:
An individual differences approach. Perspectives on individual
differences(pp. 49–83). New York: Plenum Press.
Carson, R. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality.Chicago:
Aldine.
Carson, R. C. (1982). Self-fulfilling prophecy, maladaptive behavior,
and psychotherapy. In J. C. Anchin & D. J. Kiesler (Eds.),Hand-
book of interpersonal psychotherapy(pp. 64–77). New York:
Pergamon.
Carson, R. C. (1991). The social-interactional viewpoint. In
M. Hersen, A. Kazdin, & A. Bellack (Eds.),The clinical psychol-
ogy handbook(2nd ed., pp. 185–199). New York: Pergamon.
Carson, R. C. (1996). Seamlessness in personality and its derange-
ments.Journal of personality assessment, 66,240–247.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of
attachment: The structure and function of working models. In
K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.),Attachment processes in
adulthood: Vol. 5. Advances in personal relationships(pp. 53–90).
London: Jessica Kingsley.
Diamond, D., & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Internal working models of
attachment and psychoanalytic theories of the representational
world: A comparison and critique. In M. Sperling & W. H.
Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Theory, assessment, and
treatment(pp. 72–94). New York: Guilford.
Florsheim, P., Henry, W. P., & Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Integrating
individual and interpersonal approaches to diagnosis: The
structural analysis of social behavior and attachment theory. In
F. Kaslow (Ed.), Handbook of relational diagnosis(pp. 81–101).
New York: Wiley.
Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through.
Standard Edition, Volume 12, pp. 145–156. New York: Norton.
Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle.Standard Edition,
Volume 18, pp. 1–64. New York: Norton.
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind.
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Fonagy, P. (1999). Psychoanalytic theory from the viewpoint of
attachment theory and research. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver
(Eds.),Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical
applications(pp. 595–624). New York: Guilford.
Freedman, M. B., Leary, T. F., Ossorio, A. G., & Coffey, H. S.
(1951). The interpersonal dimension of personality. Journal of
Personality, 20,143–161.
Gifford, R. (1991). Mapping nonverbal behavior on the Interper-
sonal Circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61,
856–867.
Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psy-
choanalytic theory.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grotstein, J. S. (1981).Splitting and projective identification.
Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Gurtman, M. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personal-
ity measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,105–118.
Gurtman, M. B. (1994). The circumplex as a tool for studying nor-
mal and abnormal personality: A methodological primer. In
S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnor-
mal personality(pp. 243–263). New York: Springer.
Gurtman, M. B. (1996). Interpersonal problems and the psychother-
apy context: The construct validity of the Inventory of Interper-
sonal Problems. Psychological Assessment, 8,241–255.
Gurtman, M. B. (1997). Studying personality traits: The circular
way. In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models
of personality and emotions(pp. 81–102). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Gurtman, M. B. (2001). Interpersonal complementarity: Integrating
interpersonal measurement with interpersonal models. Journal
of Counseling Psychology, 48, 97–110.
Gurtman, M. B., & Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998). Circular measure-
ment redux: The analysis and interpretation of interpersonal
circle profiles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5,
344–360.
Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). Interpersonal Adjective
Scales: Confirmation of circumplex structure from multiple
perspectives.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26,
374–384.
Gurtman, M. B., & Pincus, A. L. (in press). The circumplex model:
Methods and research applications. In J. A. Schinka & W. F.
Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 2.
Research methods in psychology.New York: Wiley.
Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social
verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino &
E. T. Higgins (Eds.),Handbook of motivation and cognition: The
interpersonal context(pp. 29–84). New York: Guilford.
Heck, S. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2001). Agency and communion in the
structure of parental representations. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 76,180–184.
Henry, W. P. (1994). Differentiating normal and abnormal personal-
ity: An interpersonal approach based on the Structural Analysis
of Social Behavior. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiat-
ing normal and abnormal personality(pp. 316–340). New York:
Springer.
Henry, W. P. (1997). Interpersonal case formulation: Describing and
explaining interpersonal patterns using the structural analysis of
social behavior. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy
case formulation(pp. 223–259). New York: Guilford.
Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., & Strupp, H. H. (1990). Patient and
therapist introject, interpersonal process, and differential psy-
chotherapy outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psy-
chology, 58,768–774.
Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L.
(2000). IIP-64/IIP-32 professional manual.San Antonio, TX:
The Psychological Corporation.