References 295Effective procedures in one domain may be unrelated to those
in another. Considered to be emotional episodes, love and jeal-
ousy involve not just such processes as core affect and attribu-
tion but also these specific algorithms for social life—roles,
strategies, tactics, stances, norms—that shape behavior and
social interaction in a dynamic way.
Although an amalgam of prior theories, our framework
results in a picture of emotional life different from what is
currently available. The events highlighted in previous
paradigms—prototypical emotion episodes, discourse about
emotion, concepts—all occur and are important. Neverthe-
less, rather than incompatible approaches to one thing, they are
interacting parts of a larger system. This system also includes
many other related parts, such as moods, evaluations, and un-
attributed core. Whatever the fate of our specific framework, a
new study of emotion that goes beyond current assumptions
promises to yield an even richer field than we see today.
REFERENCES
Abramson, P. R., & Pinkerton, S. D. (1995). Introduction: Nature,
nurture and in between. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton
(Eds.),Sexual nature, sexual culture(pp. 1–14). Chicago: Uni-
versity of Chicago Press.
Anderson, C. A., & Anderson, D. C. (1984). Ambient temperature
and violent crime: Test of the linear and curvilinear hypotheses.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,91–97.
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York: Colum-
bia University Press.
Aspinwall, L. G. (1998). Rethinking the role of positive affect in
self-regulation.Motivation and Emotion, 22, 1–32.
Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion.
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bargh, J. A. (1997), The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S.
Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in
social cognition(Vol. 10, pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The
generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 62,893–912.
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The
automatic evaluation effect: Unconditionally automatic attitude
activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 32,185–210.
Baron, R. A. (1987). Interviewer’s mood and reactions to job
applicants: The influence of affective states on applied social
judgements.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17,911–926.
Barr-Zisowitz, C. (2000). “Sadness”—Is there such a thing? In M.
Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions
(2nd ed., pp. 607–622). New York: Guilford.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62).
San Diego, CA: Academic.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Towards a general theory of anger and
emotional aggression: Implications of the cognitive-
neoassociationistic perspective for the analysis of anger and
emotion. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Perspectives
on anger and emotion (pp. 1–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological
Bulletin, 99,229–246.
Blascovich, J. (1990). Individual differences in physiological
arousal and perception of arousal: Missing links in Jamesian no-
tions of arousal-based behaviors. Personality and Social Psy-
chology Bulletin, 16,665–675.
Bower, G. H. (1992). How might emotions affect learning? In S. A.
Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory
(pp. 3–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bower, G. H., & Forgas, J. P. (2000). Affect, memory, and social
cognition. In E. Eich, J. F. Kihlstrom, G. H. Bower, J. P. Forgas,
& P. M. Niedenthal (Eds.), Cognition and emotion(pp. 87–168).
New York: Oxford University Press.
Briggs, J. (1970). Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social
life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126,
187–219.
Bull, N. (1951). The attitude theory of emotion. New York: Nervous
and Mental Disease Monographs.
Cabanac, M. (1990). Taste: The maximization of multidimensional
pleasure. In E. D. Capaldi & T. L. Pawley (Eds.), Taste, experi-
ence, and feeding(pp. 28–42). Washington DC: American Psy-
chological Association.
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Larsen, J. T., Poehlmann, K. M., &
Ito, T. A. (2000). The psychophysology of emotion. In M.
Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions
(2nd ed., pp. 173–191). New York: Guilford.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The
affect system: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 76,839–855.
Camras, L. A. (2000). Surprise! Facial expressions can be coor-
dinative motor structures. In M. D. Lewis and I. Granic (Eds.),
Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems
approaches to emotional development(pp. 100–124). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Cantril, H. (1934). The roles of the situation and adrenalin in the
induction of emotion. The American Journal of Psychology, 46,
568–579.
Cantril, H., & Hunt, W. A. (1932). Emotional effects produced by
the injection of adrenalin. The American Journal of Psychology,
44,300–307.