Handbook of Psychology, Volume 5, Personality and Social Psychology

(John Hannent) #1

320 Attitudes in Social Behavior


Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function.
In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook
of social psychology(4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Eagly, A. H., Chen, S., Chaiken, S., & Shaw-Barnes, K. (1999). The
impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember. Psycho-
logical Bulletin, 125,64–89.
Eaves, L., Eysenck, H. J., & Martin, N. G. (1989). Genes, culture,
and personality: An empirical approach. London: Academic
Press.
Ennis, R., & Zanna, M. P. (2000). Attitude function and the
automobile. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.),Why we eval-
uate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 395–415). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereo-
types, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes.
In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition,
and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception
(pp. 137–166). New York: Academic Press.
Esses, V. M., & Maio, G. R. (2002). Expanding the assessment of at-
titude components and structure: The benefits of open-ended
measures for assessing attitude structure. In W. Stroebe &
M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, 12,
71–102. London: Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Esses, V. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1995). Mood and the expression of
ethnic stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 69,1052–1068.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide be-
havior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P.
Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol.
23, pp. 75–109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fazio, R. H. (1993). Variability in the likelihood of automatic atti-
tude activation: Data re-analysis and commentary on Bargh,
Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992). Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 64,753–758, 764–765.
Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: De-
terminants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibil-
ity. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength:
Antecedents and consequences(pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Fazio, R. H. (2000). Accessible attitudes as tools for object ap-
praisal: Their costs and benefits. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson
(Eds.),Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes(pp. 1–36).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995).
Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of
racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 69,1013–1027.
Fazio, R. H., Ledbetter, J. E., & Towles-Schwen, T. (2000). On the
costs of accessible attitudes: Detecting that the attitude object
has changed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,
197–210.


Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R.
(1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 50,229–238.
Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a
moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior rela-
tions: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,505–514.
Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to
the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Ex-
perimental Social Psychology, 14, 398–408.
Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-
behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in exper-
imental social psychology(Vol. 14, pp. 161–202). San Diego,
CA: Academic Press.
Feather, N. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of
values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,1135–1151.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and
private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 43,522–527.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL:
Row, Peterson.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and be-
havior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Fleishman, J. A. (1986). Types of political attitude structure: Results
of a cluster analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50,371–386.
Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure. In
L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology
(Vol. 2, pp. 57–97). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to informa-
tion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psy-
chology(Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Frey, D., & Rosch, M. (1984). Information seeking after decisions:
The roles of novelty of information and decision reversibility.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10,91–98.
Gardner, W., Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S., & Berntson, G. (1994). A late
positive brain potential indexes between participant differences
in evaluative categorizations.Psychophysiology, 31,S49.
Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile
media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
30,165–180.
Glaser, J., & Salovey, P. (1998). Affect in electoral politics. Person-
ality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 156–172.
Gold, J. A., & Robbins, M. A. (1979). Attitudes and values: A fur-
ther test of the semantic memory model. Journal of Social Psy-
chology, 108,75–81.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Goal effects on ac-
tion and cognition. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.),
Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles(pp. 361–399).
New York: Guilford.
Free download pdf