References 321Goodstadt, M. (1971). Helping and refusal to help: A test of balance
and reactance theories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychol-
ogy, 7,610–622.
Green, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement
error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 64,1029–1041.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition:
Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review,
102,4–27.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998).
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The im-
plicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 74,1464–1480.
Greenwald, A. G., & Sakumura, J. S. (1967). Attitude and selective
learning: Where are the phenomena of yesteryear? Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 7,387–397.
Guglielmi, R. S. (1999). Psychophysiological assessment of preju-
dice: Past research, current status, and future directions. Person-
ality and Social Psychology Review, 3,123–157.
Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). On the use of open-ended
measures to assess attitudinal components. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 37,129–149.
Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the
structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward
homosexuals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,
1105–1118.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New
York: Wiley.
Herek, G. M. (1986). The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a
neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 99–114.
Herek, G. M. (2000). The social construction of attitudes: Func-
tional consensus and divergence in the U.S. public’s reac-
tions to AIDS. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.),Why we
evaluate: Functions of attitudes(pp. 325–364). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applica-
bility, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.),
Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles(pp. 133–168).
New York: Guilford.
Houston, D. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a func-
tion of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments sub-
jectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51–66.
Jonas, K., Diehl, M., & Brömer, P. (1997). Effects of attitude am-
bivalence on information processing and attitude-intention con-
sistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33,
190–210.
Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new para-
digm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin,
76,349–364.
Jordon, N. (1953). Behavioral forces that are a function of attitudes
and cognitive organization. Human Relations, 6,273–287.
Judd, C. M., & Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social atti-
tudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personal-
ity and Social Psychology, 38,569–578.
Jussim, L., Nelson, T. E., Manis, M., & Soffin, S. (1995). Prejudice,
stereotypes, and labeling effects: Sources of bias in person per-
ception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68,
228–246.
Kallgren, C. A., & Wood, W. (1986). Access to attitude-relevant
information in memory as a determinant of attitude-behavior
consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22,
328–338.
Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in
attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of
the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77,
361–372.
Kardes, F. R., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Voss, R. T., & Fazio, R. H.
(1986). Self-monitoring and attitude accessibility. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12,468–474.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes.
Public Opinion Quarterly, 24,163–204.
Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American
value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cogni-
tive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
55,893–905.
Kempf, D. S. (1999). Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct
roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products.
Psychology and Marketing, 16,35–50.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature
and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political
action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social
psychology(3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 659–741). New York: Random
House.
Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A
meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 21,58–75.
Kristiansen, C. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). Justifying attitudes by
appealing to values: A functional perspective. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 27, 247–256.
Krosnick, J. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15,297–308.
Krosnick, J. A., & Abelson, R. P. (1992). The case for measuring
attitude strength in surveys. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about
questions(pp. 177–203). New York: Sage.
Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., &
Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many
related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 65,1132–1151.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge:
Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of
the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social