374 Persuasion and Attitude ChangeBornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition
and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 63,545–552.
Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and
discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a percep-
tual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect.
Social Cognition, 12,103–128.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist,
36,129–148.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and
cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Person-
ality and Social Psychology, 47,1191–1205.
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of
alternatives.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52,
384–389.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.San
Diego, CA: Academic.
Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dis-
sonance.New York: Wiley.
Brickman, P., Redfield, J., Harrison, A., & Crandall, R. (1972).
Drive and predisposition as factors in the attitudinal effects of
mere exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8,
31–44.
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Overt head movements and per-
suasion: A self-validation analysis.Unpublished manuscript,
Ohio State University, Columbus.
Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to per-
suade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology, 3,296–309.
Brucks, M., Armstrong, G. M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1988). Chil-
dren’s use of cognitive defenses against television advertising: A
cognitive response approach. Journal of Consumer Research,
14,471–482.
Burnkrant, R. E., & Howard, D. J. (1984). Effects of the use of
introductory rhetorical questions versus statements on informa-
tion processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
47,1218–1230.
Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy
for increasing processing of message content. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 15,628–638.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between at-
titudes and evaluative space: A critical review with emphasis on
the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychologi-
cal Bulletin, 115,401–423.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Jr., Bernston, G. G., & Coles, M. G. H.
(1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they
not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Sci-
ence, 4,108–112.
Cacioppo, J. T., Marshall-Goodell, B. S., Tassinary, L. G., & Petty,
R. E. (1992). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical
conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about theattitude stimulus is low than high. Journal of Experimental So-
cial Psychology, 28,207–233.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979a). Attitudes and cognitive
response: An electro-physiological approach. Journal of Person-
ality and Social Psychology, 37,2181–2199.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979b). Effects of message repeti-
tion and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97–109.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Jour-
nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42,116–131.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition
on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Ap-
plied Social Psychology, 10,3–12.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, B. (1996). Indi-
vidual differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of
people varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin,
119,197–253.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need
for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,805–818.
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimen-
tary determinants of attitudes: II Arm flexion and extension have
differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and So-
cial Psychology, 65,5–17.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information pro-
cessing in the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39,752–766.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P.
Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The
Ontario symposium(Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chaiken, S., & Baldwin, M. W. (1981). Affective-cognitive consis-
tency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-
perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 41,1–12.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a
determinant of message persuasiveness and message compre-
hensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34,
605–614.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a
determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,241–256.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and sys-
tematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In
J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought
(pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford.
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can
bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argu-
ment ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Jour-
nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,460–473.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social
psychology.New York: Guilford.mill_ch15.qxd 10/1/02 10:04 AM Page 374