References 375Chaiken, S., Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (1996). Principles of persua-
sion. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psy-
chology: Handbook of basic principles(pp. 702–742). New
York: Guilford.
Chaiken, S., & Yates, S. M. (1985). Affective-cognitive consistency
and thought-induced attitude polarization. Journal of Personal-
ity and Social Psychology, 49,1470–1481.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of im-
pression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal
priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 71,464–478.
Chattopadhyay, A., & Alba, J. W. (1988). The situational importance
of recall and inference in consumer decision making. Journal of
Consumer Research, 15,1–12.
Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for
consistency: The development of a valid measure and the dis-
covery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Person-
ality and Social Psychology, 69,318–328.
Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. F. (1972). Personal responsibility-
for-consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced
compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychol-
ogy, 8,558–593.
Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of
a dialogue. In E. R. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of so-
cial problems(pp. 168–189). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Cooper, J. (1971). Personal responsibility and dissonance: The role
of foreseen consequences. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 18,354–363.
Cooper, J. (1992). Dissonance and the return of the self-concept.
Psychological Inquiry, 3,320–323.
Cooper, J. (1999). Unwanted consequences and the self: In search of
the motivation for dissonance reduction. In E. Harmon-Jones &
J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal the-
ory in social psychology(pp. 149–174). Washington DC: Amer-
ican Psychological Association.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory.
In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychol-
ogy(Vol. 17, pp. 229–266). New York: Academic Press.
Cooper, J., Fazio, R. H., & Rhodewalt, F. (1978). Dissonance and
humor: Evidence for the undifferentiated nature of dissonance
arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36,
280–285.
Cooper, J., & Worchel, S. (1970). Role of undesired consequences
in arousing cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and So-
cial Psychology, 16,199–206.
Cox, D. S., & Cox, A. D. (1988). What does familiarity breed: Com-
plexity as a moderator of repetition effects in advertisement eval-
uation.Journal of Consumer Research, 15,111–116.
Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persis-
tence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 74,1437–1450.Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of au-
tomatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of
admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and So-
cial Psychology, 81,800–814.
DeHouwer, J., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (1994). Verbal evaluative
conditioning with undetected US presentations. Behaviour Re-
search & Therapy, 32,629–633.
DeHouwer, J., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (1998). Affective and iden-
tity priming with episodically associated stimuli. Cognition &
Emotion, 12,145–169.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic
and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56,5–18.
Dickerson, C. A., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., & Miller, D. (1992).
Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22,841–854.
Dillehay, R. C., Insko, C. A., & Smith, M. B. (1966). Logical con-
sistency and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 3,646–654.
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of
differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred con-
clusions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63,
568–584.
Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., &
Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-
inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 75,53–69.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Beach, K. R. (2000). Implicit and
explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between mea-
sures of intergroup bias. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.),
Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intrapersonal
processes.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard,
A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled
processes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33,
510–540.
Eagly, A. H. (1974). Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as
a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and So-
cial Psychology, 29,758–773.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1984). Cognitive theories of persua-
sion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social
psychology(Vol. 17, pp. 268–361). New York: Academic Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes.
Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In
D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.),The handbook of
social psychology(Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S., & Wood, W. (1981). An attribution analy-
sis of persuasion. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd
(Eds.),New direction in attribution research(Vol. 3, pp. 37–62).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.mill_ch15.qxd 10/1/02 10:04 AM Page 375