References 377Griffitt, W. B. (1970). Environmental effects on interpersonal affec-
tive behavior: Ambient effective temperature and attraction.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15,240–244.
Gross, S., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In R. E.
Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and
consequences(pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hammond, K. R. (1948). Measuring attitudes by error-choice: an in-
direct method. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43,
38–48.
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E., (1981). The multiple source effect in
persuasion: The effects of distraction. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 7,627–635.
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1987). Information utility and the
multiple source effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 52,260–268.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and experienced
negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced
negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26,1490–1501.
Harmon-Jones, E., Brehm, J. W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., &
Nelson, D. E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive
consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,5–16.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance:
Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology.Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory
and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-
based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93,258–268.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations.New
York: Wiley.
Hermans, D., Crombez, G., & Eelen, P. (2000). Automatic attitude
activation and efficiency: The fourth horseman of automaticity.
Psychologica Belgica, 40,403–422.
Henninger, M., & Wyer, R. S. (1976). The recognition and elimina-
tion of inconsistencies among syllogistically related beliefs:
Some new light on the “Socratic effect.” Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 34,680–693.
Higgins, E. T., Rhodewalt, F., & Zanna, M. P. (1979). Dissonance
motivation: Its nature, persistence, and reinstatement. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 15,16–34.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication
and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change.New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hoyt, M. F., Henley, M. D., & Collins, B. E. (1972). Studies in
forced compliance: The confluence of choice and consequences
on attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 23,205–210.
Insko, C. A. (1984). Balance theory, the Jordan paradigm, and the
Wiest tetrahedron. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experi-
mental social psychology(Vol. 18, pp. 89–140). Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989).
Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid
unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 56,326–338.
Janis, I. L. (1968). Attitude change via role playing. In R. P. Abelson,
E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, &
P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A
sourcebook(pp. 810–818). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1954). The influence of role playing on
opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49,
211–218.
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1965). Effectiveness of emotional role-
playing in modifying smoking habits and attitudes. Journal of
Experimental Research in Personality, 1,84–90.
Jarvis, W. B. G., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (1999). Do attitudes
really change? An exploration of the PAST model.Unpublished
manuscript, Columbus, OH.
Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement
on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106,
290–314.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The
attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 219–
266). New York: Academic Press.
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A.
(2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the
negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,871–888.
Kiesler, S. B., & Mathog, R. (1968). The distraction hypothesis in
attitude change. Psychological Reports, 23,1123–1133.
King, B. T., & Janis, I. L. (1956). Comparison of the effectiveness of
improvised versus non-improvised role-playing in producing
opinion changes. Human Relations, 9,177–186.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). Attitude importance and attitude change.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24,240–255.
Krosnick, J. A., Betz, A. L., Jussim, L. J., & Lynn, A. R. (1992).
Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 18,152–162.
Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M., &
Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many
related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 65,1132–1151.
Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview.
In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: An-
tecedents and consequences(pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing:
Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins & R. M.
Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foun-
dations of social behavior(Vol. 2, pp. 333–368). New York:
Guilford.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreez-
ing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnicmill_ch15.qxd 10/1/02 10:04 AM Page 377