378 Persuasion and Attitude Changestereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 19,448–468.
Kruglanski, A. W., Freund, T., & Bar-Tal, D. (1996). Motivational
effects in the mere-exposure paradigm. European Journal of
Social Psychology, 26,479–499.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a
single route: A view from the Unimodel. Psychological Inquiry,
10,83–109.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological
Bulletin, 108,480–498.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimina-
tion of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207,557–558.
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining
children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the
“overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 28,129–137.
Levine, G. L., Halberstadt, J. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Rea-
soning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,230–240.
Lichtenstein, M., & Srull, T. K. (1987). Processing objectives as a
determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23,93–118.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes.
Archives of Psychology, 140,55.
Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. (1981). Principles of memory and
cognition in attitude formation. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, &
T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion(pp. 399–
420). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation
and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subse-
quently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 37,2098–2109.
Losch, M. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Cognitive dissonance may
enhance sympathetic tonus, but attitudes are changed to reduce
negative affect rather than arousal. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 26,289–304.
Lutz, R. J. (1975). Changing brand attitudes through modifi-
cation of cognitive structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 1,
49–59.
Lutz, R. J. (1977). An experimental investigation of causal relations
among cognitions, affect, and behavioral intention. Journal of
Consumer Research, 3,197–208.
MacKenzie, S. B. (1986). The role of attention in mediating the ef-
fect of advertising on attribute importance. Journal of Consumer
Research, 13,174–195.
Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of
majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 53,41–52.
Mackie, D. M., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). On-line and memory-
based modification of attitudes: Determinants of message recall-
attitude change correspondence. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 59,5–16.Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the
mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personal-
ity and Social Psychology, 57,27–40.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994).
Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound.Jour-
nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,808–817.
Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic pro-
cessing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent infor-
mation on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 61,13–33.
Maio, G. R., Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence in per-
suasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32,513–536.
Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990). Assimilation and
contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to
expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 59,27–37.
McGuire, W. J. (1960). A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relation-
ships. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.),Attitude organi-
zation and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude
components(pp. 65–111). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some
contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology(Vol. 1, pp. 191–229). New
York: Academic.
McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An
information-processing theory. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock,
& T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes
(pp. 171–196). New York: Academic.
McGuire, W. J. (1981). The probabilogical model of cognitive struc-
ture and attitude change. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C.
Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion(pp. 291–307).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1991). The content, structure,
and operation of thought systems. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. Srull
(Eds.),Advances in social cognition(Vol. 4, pp. 1–78). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Thought-induced attitude
change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. Jour-
nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,259–269.
Miller, C. E., & Norman, R. M. G. (1976). Balance, agreement, and
attraction in hypothetical social situations. Journal of Experi-
mental Social Psychology, 12,109–119.
Moore, D. L., & Reardon, R. (1987). Source magnification: The role
of multiple sources in the processing of advertising appeals.
Journal of Marketing Research, 24,412–417.
Mugny, G., & Perez, J. A. (1991). The social psychology of minority
influence.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1995). Additivity
of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and
exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,
589–602.mill_ch15.qxd 10/1/02 10:04 AM Page 378