References 379Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and aware-
ness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal exposures.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64,723–739.
Newcomb, T. M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. P. Abelson, E.
Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, &
P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A
sourcebook(pp. 28–51). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Nienhuis, A. E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Spears, R. (2001). Multiple
motives and persuasive communication: Creative elaboration as
a result of impression motivation and accuracy motivation. Per-
sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,118–132.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can
know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological
Review, 84,231–259.
Olson, T. M., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude forma-
tion through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12,
413–417.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The mea-
surement of meaning.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Peak, H. (1955). Attitude and motivation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.),
Nebraska Symposium on Motivation(Vol. 3, pp. 149–188).
Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in
evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational
negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1,
33–60.
Perloff, R. M., & Brock, T. C. (1980). And thinking makes it so:
Cognitive responses to persuasion. In M. Roloff & G. Miller
(Eds.),Persuasion: New directions in theory and research
(pp. 67–100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Petty, R. E. (1994). Two routes to persuasion: State of the art. In G.
d’Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.), International
perspectives on psychological science(Vol. 2, pp. 229–247).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E. (1997). The evolution of theory and research in social
psychology: From single to multiple effect and process models
of persuasion. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The mes-
sage of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society
(pp. 268–290). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Petty, R E., Baker, S. M., & Gleicher, S. M. (1991). Attitudes and
drug abuse prevention: Implications of the Elaboration Likeli-
hood Model. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & W. J. Bukoski
(Eds.),Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention
(pp. 72–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (in press). Thought confi-
dence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hy-
pothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979a). Effects of forewarning of
persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses. Per-
sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5,173–176.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979b). Issue-involvement can
increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevantcognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol-
ogy, 37,1915–1926.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981).Attitudes and persuasion: Clas-
sic and contemporary approaches.Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on
responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and periph-
eral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 46,69–81.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood
Model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experi-
mental social psychology(Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York:
Academic.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion:
Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107,367–374.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal in-
volvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Jour-
nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41,847–855.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Haugtvedt, C. (1992). Involvement
and persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherifs’ contribution
to the study of self-relevance and attitude change. In D.
Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.), A social judgment and intergroup
relations: Essays in honor of Muzifer Sherif(pp. 147–175). New
York: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). Effects of
rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response
analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40,
432–440.
Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., Priester, J. R., & Feinstein, A. H.
(2001). Violation of individual versus group self-interest: Impli-
cations for message processing and persuasion. Social Cogni-
tion, 19,418–442.
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of
group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information
processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
38,81–92.
Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as
a determinant of attitude strength. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick
(Eds.),Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences(pp. 93–
130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1998, October). What happens to
the “old” attitude when attitudes change?Presented at the an-
nual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology,
Lexington, KY.
Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents
and consequences.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive re-
sponses in persuasion.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Cognitive
processes in attitude change. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.),
Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 2, 69–142).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.mill_ch15.qxd 10/1/02 10:04 AM Page 379