CHAPTER 23
Aggression, Violence, Evil, and Peace
JOSEPHDERIVERA
569
AGGRESSION 569
Social Learning Theories 570
Emotional Bases 571
Biological Perspectives 572
Conflict Theories 573
VIOLENCE AND ITS CONTROL 574
Personal Violence 574
Community Violence 577
Societal Violence 579
Structural Violence 582
EVIL 583
Conceptions of Evil and Its Experience 583
The Ambiguous Role of Religion 584
PEACE 585
Peace Through Strength 586
Peace Through Negotiation 587
Peace Through Justice 588
Peace Through Personal Transformation 589
Developing Cultures of Peace 590
REFERENCES 592
Although aggression, violence, and evil are interrelated, con-
temporary research is so specialized that it is unusual to
group them together, and this chapter is unique in considering
them together with ideas and research on peace. Why place
such disparate fields in the same chapter? In part, it is because
we study aggression and violence in order to avoid the evil
that they occasion and to achieve peace. However, if peace
were simply the absence of violence, it would not require
separate treatment; and if peace were a completely indepen-
dent field, it would be better to make use of separate chapters.
Typically, there are separate chapters on aggression and
prosocial behavior. Here, however, we argue that the achieve-
ment of peace rests on an understanding of aggression, vio-
lence, and evil, yet requires us to go beyond that material to
include not only what is usually conceived as prosocial
behavior but the use of aggression in a struggle with violence
and evil. Hence, we must consider these topics in conjunction
with one another. The attainment of peace requires us to have
an understanding of aggression, and the pitfalls of violence
and evil, as well as the various paths that may lead toward a
peaceful world.
We begin with aggression because although it is often
violent, aspects of aggression may be necessary for the
achievement of peace. We will then sample the voluminous
literature on forms of violence and the ways in which it may
be controlled. Although many of these forms are clearly
related to aggression, Gandhi asserted that the worst form of
violence is poverty. Such violence is masked and occurs be-
cause of unjust economic and political structures. And when
we turn to examine evil we find that a difficult moral judg-
ment is involved. Although most contemporary judgment
considers violence to be evil, much of our striving for peace
and justice involves us in violence that we do not acknowl-
edge as evil. This is one of the facts that requires us to base
any quest for peace (valued as good) on a thorough under-
standing of violence and evil. In this way, we will not be
naive when we finally come to consider how peace may be
attained.
AGGRESSION
Aggression has different meanings that focus our attention on
different aspects of behavior and lead to the creation of dif-
ferent approaches to its understanding. We may distinguish at
least three different definitions:
1.Aggression as behavior intended to hurt an other,whether
this intent is motivated emotionally (as by anger, pain,
frustration, or fear) or instrumentally, as a means to an end
(as in punishing misbehavior or intimidating an other to
attain one’s end.) There are two caveats to this definition.
First, the intention to hurt may be embedded in larger in-
tentions that have quite different meanings. Although the